4 ms·
> It's not, in most juridictions at least What did I miss they did that's illegal? It looked like it downloaded a public docker image, searched around inside,
by kadoban 27d ago
> It's not, in most juridictions at least
What did I miss they did that's illegal? It looked like it downloaded a public docker image, searched around inside, and verified that the key it found was still valid (without making any changes), and then immediately notified them about the issue.
- dwedge 27d agoIf there is anything that was a crime (and it totally depends on jurisdiction), it was verifying the key. They used it to see what it could access, and by using it they had unauthorised access to a system
- fragmede 27d agoThe CFAA is broad enough to make that a crime.
- IshKebab 27d agoPeople have been arrested for far less. I dunno what the least offensive conviction has been though tbf. Anyone know?
- nrmitchi 27d agoThey "validated that the key was valid" by iterating internal repositories and listing the contents of said repos and poking around at what they do/are-for, including, apparently, iterating through customer lists/information. The white-hat line stops at "validated the key was valid". It does not extend to "poking around inside to extract business-confidential customer information".