kadoban

4 ms·

31.
by kadoban 1mo ago
> the triple digits IQ of Hegseth, Trump and Bessent. One digit each.
32.
by kadoban 1mo ago
At some point they might prefer stability and sanity. I would bet that at this point they don't care much either way. China is playing long, most of the ~unchanging things are in their favor and the US already proved that they're
33.
by kadoban 1mo ago
You know you can define your own provider filters and orderings, right? The filters and such are not _that_ advanced, but it might do what you need if you haven't already tried that.
34.
by kadoban 1mo ago
You'd have to look where the extra tokens are coming from. If it's using extra turns or doing extra work because a tool it ~wants is missing, then adding extra things will help. Otherwise, it won't. If it's missing guida
35.
by kadoban 1mo ago
Pi is just a nice base and it has defined extension protocols and such. You might as well start there, it's just easier and going from nothing to working to adding whatever functionality is like 2 minutes.
36.
by kadoban 1mo ago
> "this is a benchmark" is such an easy category to determine I mean, it's not _that_ hard to determine most likely, and/or it's hard to be sure you didn't get found out by llm-assisted analysis on your traf
37.
by kadoban 1mo ago
> AlphaZero (which later became Leela? I'm not sure) Pretty much. DeepMind never released their code or models, just the main ideas of their techniques and training. Leela, which came out of the go-ai world, implemented the paper(s)
38.
by kadoban 1mo ago
Yes. The ways to improve are: faster search (which lets you search more deeply) or better evaluation of a position or better heuristics.
39.
by kadoban 1mo ago
Doing this in a way that doesn't get you noticed or fucked with is potentially going to be quite difficult. If they have a "hey we're being benchmarked" mode, which is not hard to imagine, avoiding tripping it is going t
40.
by kadoban 1mo ago
Way back when I worked in a restaurant, there was that but then also if a customer complains they also go clean. They're never going to be like "Oh, someone shat on the floor? We'll deal with that at the next scheduled cleani
41.
by kadoban 1mo ago
> The fact that they didn't understand this when they proposed the idea shows you how little they knew of the Linux ecosystem, and the fact that they're still bringing up so many years later shows that they haven't learnt
42.
by kadoban 1mo ago
> It's surprising it's that high (8%). I would imagine it takes as long to mop a floor that has pee droplets or mop a floor that doesn’t. You might have to mop more often from complaints or inspection, maybe?
43.
by kadoban 1mo ago
> AI slop nothing burger. The “exploit” has nothing to do with coding agents. It's pretty small potatoes, but it is a harness ~bug that they treat this so poorly. It getting triggered before some of them even ask you if you trust th
44.
by kadoban 1mo ago
Yeah, thanks, I forgot that existed. That definitely weakens my point quite a bit. It's still not _quite_ the same thing because an advantage in playouts is not a great model for how a stronger/weaker player dynamic actually works
45.
by kadoban 1mo ago
That's the basic idea, yeah. When playing white in handicap games, you want to make your opponent uncomfortable. Play moves where the simple/safe/obvious move is just a little bit bad. Force them to choose between complex fig
46.
by kadoban 1mo ago
> That humans can make sufficiently strong calculators has never been a dispute in my mind. Within our lifetimes (unless you're quite young) it was doubtful if a go ai would ever beat a decent human. Same was true for chess a genera
47.
by kadoban 1mo ago
There are tweaks to move choice like that, but it's all evaluation time. None of that happens in training. Zero times in the RL loop does katago see a two stone game against a weaker player. You can kind of tweak towards play this metr
48.
by kadoban 1mo ago
The headline is misleading, but this is still huge. 2 stones against katago is insane, I'd never have guessed we'd see that, ever.
49.
by kadoban 1mo ago
> Also, the human played a strategy tailored to that huge initial advantage. He said that the AI did not handle this particularly well, and played high probability moves instead of trying to lure him into a mistake. Yeah, katago's t
50.
by kadoban 1mo ago
That's not ironic, that's _hey, look over there!_
51.
by kadoban 2mo ago
The wording of the announcements, sounds like a student synthesized it. Can't imagine why, hopefully it wasn't a fatal mistake.
52.
by kadoban 2mo ago
Pi.dev has an extension that does it. None of the models I use seem to have that failure mode so I haven't bothered throwing it in. The failure mode I run into commonly is agents just stop sometimes. Even sending a "." Or som
53.
by kadoban 2mo ago
> The problems start once you consider quantum mechanics, because any such singularity will break unitarity (a fancy way of saying that probabilities must add up to 1), which means your theory as a whole can no longer make predictions. H
54.
by kadoban 2mo ago
It's not that useful for a person to be able to read an analog clock either, but if a supposed-genius came to me and confidently gave the wrong answer, it would say something about their strengths/weaknesses in general. The whole
55.
by kadoban 2mo ago
> What stopped them? This would be impossible to get past ethical review in any institution who has such a thing. You'd be forcing people to have a trip, which may or may not be pleasant for them, for days, with no guidance on wtf i
56.
by kadoban 2mo ago
That's probably based on some specific definition of food poisoning where you get effects from the food. It's semantics rather than saying anything useful about what's going on.
57.
by kadoban 2mo ago
Tbh I just go through openrouter because it's easy, so you can just go down the list in that and see who sounds good. I honestly don't spend much time at it.
58.
by kadoban 2mo ago
I wouldn't just rush out and buy hardware, but there will be benchmarks after a while to make an informed decision. 95GB active is not _too_ bad, would require some creativity and $$, but I bet I could do that at home for less than a c
59.
by kadoban 2mo ago
> no zdr ofcourse. Since the models are open, there's other infra providers who have different policies.
60.
by kadoban 2mo ago
Training scales pretty badly, so smaller models like this are really not that bad in terms of cost.

More ›