juve1996

9 ms·

31.
by juve1996 3y ago
Many Americans supported torture in Guantanamo bay in the name of safety, and other US atrocities. The idea that they wouldn't win over a majority of Americans seems unlikely.
32.
by juve1996 3y ago
Can you point out what's happening in the video? I don't see anything
33.
by juve1996 3y ago
Until all of the cool stuff is hidden behind paywalls.
34.
by juve1996 3y ago
> That's true, but now it's incredibly easy to create a human-quality bullshit paper. No, it's incredibly easy to create human-quality syntax. Not meaning. The source of the value was never the paper or the syntax - it was
35.
by juve1996 3y ago
No, papers are not always useful. That isn't an inherent property. They can be useful. It depends on the content of the paper. If you can't tell whether a paper is real or bullshit it doesn't matter if an AI or a human crea
36.
by juve1996 3y ago
The only reason it's a problem is that papers became the measure - more papers = more prestige. The measure will simply change because now it won't have a strong signal.
37.
by juve1996 3y ago
You're overthinking it. If what you're saying is true, assassinations would run rampant. They don't, despite your perceived asymmetry. The AI doesn't have to stop the gun from firing, or even being manufactured. It has t
38.
by juve1996 3y ago
> That doesn't follow. It's like saying "if the AI can build a gun that can kill a human, it can build an anti-gun that can stop the gun". Why couldn't it? Metal of X thickness = stopped bullet. Not exactly a har
39.
by juve1996 3y ago
Sam Altman can bet right now. If he truly believes in this risk, he could bet his entire company, shut everything down, and lobby for a complete ban on AI research. If the outcome is certain death, this seems like a great bet to make.
40.
by juve1996 3y ago
If a superintelligence is smart enough to create a virus I'm sure it can also create a virophage to counter it. Whether or not the humans have more than a trillion and viruses only 1 million ways to die, will not have any impact. I sus
41.
by juve1996 3y ago
Doesn't really change the point. If the users don't equal the customer then UI/UX doesn't matter at all so long as customers keep buying it. In this scenario, firing UI/UX makes the most sense, because it doesn&#x27
42.
by juve1996 3y ago
Sure, but clever mumbo jumbo won't distract from the principle point. If AI can create a virus that kills all humans, another AI can create a virus that kills that virus. The virus has trillions more ways to be killed than to keep it a
43.
by juve1996 3y ago
The entire GP's argument has no citations either and that is the framework we are working under - that superintelligence can do anything you tell it to do. Ask him for his citation, then the rest follows.
44.
by juve1996 3y ago
If AI is as dangerous as the signatories believe then they should just outright ban it. The fact that they aren't throws doubt on their position completely.
45.
by juve1996 3y ago
Every human has bias, no one is infallible, no matter how many awards they have to their name. The reason why people doubt is cui bono. And it's a perfectly rational take.
46.
by juve1996 3y ago
For humans, maybe. Not an AI superintelligence.
47.
by juve1996 3y ago
What's more realistic: regulatory capture and US hegemony on AI or general intelligence destroying the world in the next 20 years? Go ahead and bet. I doubt you're putting your money on AGI.
48.
by juve1996 3y ago
Sure, and you can set another superintelligence on another task - prevent covid ebola. See the problem with these scenarios?
49.
by juve1996 3y ago
Your post seems to reinforce the article to me. There should already be people researching the customer/market. It seems redundant to have product do research and then have UI/UX also do that same research (as in your first exampl
50.
by juve1996 3y ago
We aren't arguing universal truths. This was a fought war with context. No claim of universal truth was made. > They don't continue until every wrong has been righted. It is far from clear that the us would have entered the Pac
51.
by juve1996 3y ago
Japan stole quite a bit, from quite a few people, in the Pacific theater. The war doesn't end when the US gets back what was stolen - it ends when all of its allies get back, what was stolen.
52.
by juve1996 3y ago
Are you really going to suggest an attack that killed 2,403 Americans, sunk five U.S. battleships & damaged 4 others ships, and destroyed 188 aircraft, is not a proper attack? because it wasn't on the "mainland?"
53.
by juve1996 3y ago
I think this is generally true, but is it true right now? It seems like all generations know we aren't in great times.
54.
by juve1996 3y ago
Realistically though most of the internet has become more centralized. Even if there is good in the far corners, most don't find it anymore.
55.
by juve1996 3y ago
I'd rather be dead anyway than live in that world compared to the one I live in now.
56.
by juve1996 3y ago
Owning property in a place where all the money is leaving is a poor investment.
57.
by juve1996 3y ago
Cities can't continually become unaffordable if all the rich people you say are leaving don't come back. It doesn't equate.
58.
by juve1996 3y ago
> "You know what would be better? If I were sitting on some form of public transit right now..." But almost everyone would say "it would be better if there was less traffic to deal with."
59.
by juve1996 3y ago
"Cultural norms" has never, ever gotten in the way of profit. Companies have been working with offshore talent for decades.
60.
by juve1996 3y ago
Is there a way I can hallucinate to this time as well? :)

More ›