4 ms·
No, papers are not always useful. That isn't an inherent property. They can be useful. It depends on the content of the paper. If you can't tell whether a pape
by juve1996 3y ago
No, papers are not always useful. That isn't an inherent property. They can be useful. It depends on the content of the paper.
If you can't tell whether a paper is real or bullshit it doesn't matter if an AI or a human created it. Journalists will, heaven forbid, have to do real journalism instead of blindly trusting some piece of paper they found somewhere.
- burkaman 3y ago> If you can't tell whether a paper is real or bullshit it doesn't matter if an AI or a human created it. That's true, but now it's incredibly easy to create a human-quality bullshit paper. That wasn't true a year ago. It doesn't matter who created it, but it does matter how easy it was to create. > Journalists will, heaven forbid, have to do real journalism instead of blindly trusting some piece of paper they found somewhere. That's true, but now it's incredibly easy to generate a real-looking piece of paper and send it to a journalist, prompting them to spend a day doing real journalism to verify it. That wasn't true a year ago.
- juve1996 3y ago> That's true, but now it's incredibly easy to create a human-quality bullshit paper. No, it's incredibly easy to create human-quality syntax. Not meaning. The source of the value was never the paper or the syntax - it was the meaning of the paper. Whether a human or an AI creates bullshit matters not.