jncfhnb

32 ms·

841.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
It is not at all difficult to understand that I’m “hearing” my thoughts and imagined sounds It would be unfathomable for me to have this experience and not acknowledge that my mind is simulating sound
842.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
But surely nobody sees the fruit rendered into their actual vision as if all mental imagery appears as a literal hallucination in their vision.
843.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Change is hard, firing people isn’t fun, and incentives don’t always align
844.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
This statement is correct. Don’t downvote it. It also compounds as calorically dense ultra processed foods lack the nutritional content make you stay full
845.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37040535/ > Share the study that backs your assertions. If you don't have a study then everything you've claimed has no scientific basis. How about “that sounds interesting,
846.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Decline in food quality is ostensibly a decline in food security. But any sensible design would not use that as a threshold for defining food security. Rather than appealing to some unnamed source’s cherry picked definition, you would do be
847.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Could you list some specifics because I cannot follow you at all
848.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
I’m not sure what you’re trying to claim. Poverty is obviously well correlated with food insecurity.
849.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
You’re being presented with literal statistics on food insecurity and ignoring what you’re being told. Many people are both food insecure AND fat because food insecurity drives people to eat as much as they can because of the fear of being
850.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
More simply: people who grow up hungry learn to eat whenever they can because being hungry is awful It doesn’t even need to generalize. This is just a basic food security thing and is part of the reason why obesity is counter intuitively co
851.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
A lot of people provide negative value. Not net negative, in their work is less valuable than their salary, but actually negative value in that they just slow things down, waste resources, or prevent innovation for their own job security
852.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
> I hated high school. > So I ditched as much class as I could and spent my time racing muscle cars on Route 66 outside of my hometown of Baxter Springs and pursuing other misadventures. I was always reading, though, and in between re
853.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Author seems oddly fixated on high density batteries with huge outputs. Imo the important changes to society are just the ones that are slow and big and cheap
854.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Yeah I mean like controlnet / ipadapter / animateddiff / in painting stuff I don’t feel like base models are super useful. Most real use cases depend on being able to iterate on consistent outputs imo. I have had a very bad e
855.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
It’ll need time for the goodies beyond the base model though I would guess
856.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Looks like a very promising model. Hope to see the comfyui community get it going quickly
857.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
No, it’s definitely the size. Tiny LLMs are shit. Stable Diffusion 3’s problem is not that that its training set was wildly different, it’s that it’s just too small (because the one released so far is not the full size). You can get better
858.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
> Whether or not source code is the preferred form to modify something is entirely beside the point. I'm not sure where you got this, but it's simply wrong. Please stop spreading blatant misinformation. I’m not sure how you cou
859.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Yeah but the AI in the games you like was good because it was fun, not because they were circle strafing or doing movement mechanics that are explicitly effective but not realistic. Doing these things would make those AI much less fun as we
860.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
> Human readable is a requirement. The existence of things that don't fit into this paradigm doesn't invalidate it entirely, it just proves that it is imperfect. However, it being imperfect does not mean that 1 + 1 = 2. Semanti
861.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
> I thought the best thing I could do is approach them in a friendly manner, so I put my head down, showing I was not threatening, I don’t know if this is, or is not, the best thing to do but what stands out to me here is it seems to be
862.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
“Human readable” is not a requirement. Visual programming code breaks down to some obtuse data structure. But with the right tools, it’s easy for humans to interact with it. Visual programming node workflows can be open sourced. ML models a
863.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
You probably don’t though. It’s actually really unfun to lose 50% of matches against an AI, or worse, because it doesn’t get tired or tilted or distracted. It’s much more fun to go against an AI that is dumber than you but generally more po
864.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Model weights are functions. In the same way `lambda x: x > 0.25` is a function.
865.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
We don’t even want that. Human like AI in a game like this would be really annoying for that vast majority of players that absolutely suck. People who want to play against AI generally want something that’s really dumb.
866.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
ML weights ARE convenient for people to modify. You can go look at the dozens of modifications of diffusion models being produced, daily, on civit ai. It’s very easy.
867.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Your analogy does not make sense. ML weights are distributed in binary form, like object code, but it is nothing like compiled binary. It’s just temporarily in binary form for convenience. It unpacks directly into its original form. This is
868.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
No it is not object code unless you want to get so stupidly pedantic that you want to argue a Python script in a zip file can’t be considered open source because it’s compressed. The model pickles unpack back to their original form. The pic
869.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Binary is not the equivalent of models. Source code is the equivalent of models. It doesn’t matter if a machine generated source code or a human did for it to be open source code.
870.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
You absolutely can and people do all the time. There are mountains of forks and dissections and improvements on open source models.

More ›