jncfhnb

46 ms·

871.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
ML weights are not binary. They are modifiable. If produce a program that outputs a hello world file, I can open source the hello world script without open sourcing the hello world generator.
872.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
ML weights are code
873.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
You’re confusing yourself with suburbs. Most American cities are highly walkable. Safety is the limiting factor.
874.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
I’m sorry are you criticizing our bureaucrats for being educated?
875.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
We can though. That was the whole point of executive agencies. To not require deadlock as a service.
876.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Shrug. I’m not the one claiming 25% is a good figure. Just that it’s a huge deal, if true.
877.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Feel like you’re answering your own question here
878.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
There’s so just much missing information or changing contexts. Forget any specific model. You will not become particularly good at any domain specific task by reading prompts of people asking questions. That data sucks.
879.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
That is precisely what you can do if your workers are 25% more efficient. Yes just a matter of recognizing it’s 25% of various job titles, not 100% of 25% of job titles Or alternatively, drastically lower the skill requirement for the job a
880.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
> That content can be and is used to train models, effectively cancelling the "data-wall", bit by bit, all the time. It really cannot.
881.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
A 25 percent efficiency boost to desk jockey labor is a profound impact.
882.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
I’ve heard for years that antibiotic resistant bacteria don’t really seem to be a threat because they tend not be very successful in the wild. Like it’s going to be, at best, a very localized outbreak because competitive pressures don’t rew
883.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Damn that’s a horrifying vision. Code by a bot that has no consistency in library preferences or the absence thereof. Peek under the hood and it’s made dozens and dozens of helper libraries that all do the same thing and get used one time.
884.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
I would rather see spending based on expected quality years of life remaining
885.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
No just plainly. That’s no particular reason to hide that kind of work. It’s just a factually incorrect statement.
886.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
McKinsey doesn’t do that sort of thing
887.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
I don’t really agree. These things are extremely small. An outage for 1-6 hours is negligible. Russia has failed all of its strategic objectives including an effort to maim Ukrainian power infrastructure. I wouldn’t have been totally surpri
888.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
I’m guessing the scale of this isn’t as large as the article implies but I suppose we’ll see It’s been sort of reassuring to see how absolutely minimal of an effect Russian hackers have had on Ukraine these past years
889.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Interesting parallels to games today. > It is bad design to put puzzles and situations into a game that require a player to die in order to learn what not to do next time. I feel like this is not good advice anymore. Nowadays dying is mo
890.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
There are some exceptions to 179, and even then it’s an election. You have specifically invoke it, It’s not a catch all for oopsies on your taxes. I already gave you an example. Goodwill.
891.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Give me your life savings or I will destroy the universe
892.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
The “theory vs practice” split here is about whether your business made any sense in the current environment, not the definition of an asset. “Business is hard” is not an argument to redefine what an asset is
893.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Literally not software dev costs. It’s in the prompt. You literally cannot simultaneously describe software dev as opex and still talk about the 800k. Those are mutually exclusive framings of the context.
894.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
> If you are a software company, that $1 million you spent on software devs is your operating expense. Actual profit that year is $0. No, it’s not. Net income here is $800k (20% amortization). Gross income is $1M. Because accounting reco
895.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Front loading is a form of getting additional money because of interest Second, any startup that shuts down will never pay the taxes on the revenue they earned but nullified with expensed product building costs.
896.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
There is no paperwork involved in depreciating a piece of furniture over a standard schedule. You seem to be of the belief that you are required to show documentation tracking individual assets. That’s not true any more than proving the pay
897.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
A specific election you can take is not at all the same as “you can do whatever”. Your writing heavily implied that they won’t penalize you for getting things wrong up to $1M. That’s flagrantly wrong. Assets do not need to be sellable. Good
898.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
You have insanely good financials in this contrived scenario. Raising debt or equity should not be a problem.
899.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Loans are exceptionally easy to get when you have $1M in REVENUE with NO OPERATIONAL EXPENSES. It’s the premise that’s contrived here.
900.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
Amortization also spreads the back loaded expenses out to the timeframe of the revenue

More ›