19 ms·
No, it’s definitely the size. Tiny LLMs are shit. Stable Diffusion 3’s problem is not that that its training set was wildly different, it’s that it’s just too s
by jncfhnb 2y ago
No, it’s definitely the size. Tiny LLMs are shit. Stable Diffusion 3’s problem is not that that its training set was wildly different, it’s that it’s just too small (because the one released so far is not the full size).
You can get better results with better data, for sure. And better architecture, for sure. But raw size is really important the difference in quality for models, all else held equal, is HUGE and obvious if you play with them.