jki275

53 ms·

691.
by jki275 6y ago
Faster is kind of a hard metric to quantify. Couple of benchmarks show intel clearly winning in the multi-core world but it looks like single core performance is a bit more of a tossup. https://gadgetversus.com/processor&#x2
692.
by jki275 6y ago
I know they will do that on occasion, for an outstanding candidate. But the vast majority of their work force has a real degree from an accredited university, and you know it.
693.
by jki275 6y ago
Software Engineering, and in my industry you have to have a degree. You simply won't get hired otherwise.
694.
by jki275 6y ago
Why would someone ask? The information is available. And if I see a degree from a university I don't recognize and then discover it's unaccredited, sure, that's a red flag. You can't get employment in my industry with
695.
by jki275 6y ago
Please don't cut sections out of what I wrote and deceptively edit it to make it look like I said something entirely different. I said your argument is wrong and that Stanford , which you claimed was not accredited, is in fact accredi
696.
by jki275 6y ago
You're making an argument from absurdity, and you're wrong. Stanford and Harvard don't need accreditation because they are among the premiere universities on the planet. Stanford is regionally accredited by the way, I&#x27
697.
by jki275 6y ago
I'm not. It's not tuition free, it has "fees" that replace tuition, and its accreditation is worthless, and the school goes to great lengths not to make that clear to its applicants. And your "UC Berkeley" stat
698.
by jki275 6y ago
By stating this, you are claiming that this fly-by-night unknown is like Stanford and Harvard. Stanford and Harvard don't need accreditation because they are the standards, and have set those standards for (Harvard anyway) nearly 400
699.
by jki275 6y ago
You probably benefit, we don't know who you are. It looks to me like you're shilling. You're a new account that exists solely to shill for your school that advertises itself as free but isn't, and advertises itself as
700.
by jki275 6y ago
Stanford doesn't need accreditation. Neither does Harvard. You're not seriously comparing the two, are you?
701.
by jki275 6y ago
It probably doesn't work that way. You probably do 3 years at this whatever and then WGU says "we'll take your history and art credits, now start the rest of your degree over with us". That's generally how this sor
702.
by jki275 6y ago
Not really. It's a story that nationally accredited schools like to tell, but it's not really true. Regionally accredited schools simply don't take credits from schools that aren't.
703.
by jki275 6y ago
It's not a real CS program. Very clear from their front page description of the program. It looks like an IT degree with a side of Java and some web programming.
704.
by jki275 6y ago
Nationally accredited. Not regionally accredited. Hence useless for academic purposes.
705.
by jki275 6y ago
They've done this before, and that's exactly what they did.
706.
by jki275 6y ago
x86-64 core patents expire in 2023.
707.
by jki275 6y ago
Those words don't appear in the article.
708.
by jki275 6y ago
I'm quite certain the Senator did not call for the murder of protestors. I actually read the article. While as a life-long military person I don't agree with his conclusions, you are mischaracterizing his article and I strongly s
709.
by jki275 6y ago
I'm not sure what you're suggesting about military "rules of engagement", but military personnel always have the right to defend themselves, including with deadly force, if they are attacked. I suspect you're missin
710.
by jki275 6y ago
They just bumped the power adapter on the 2019 MBP up a little bit. I've seen people say that if they max all cores and leave it that way it will drain the battery even if it's plugged in. I haven't attempted that, and I&#x
711.
by jki275 6y ago
Right, he wasn't charged with it. As I said. It was used as an aggravation factor (if that's the right word) at sentencing, that's true. But he wasn't charged with it.
712.
by jki275 6y ago
There's going to be a gap made by people who don't port over their software, certainly worth looking at that gap and see if there's something you can provide. Most software should be just a recompile if it's well package
713.
by jki275 6y ago
No, that wouldn't work that way.
714.
by jki275 6y ago
He wasn't charged with that, although all reports indicate he did do it. All sorts of conspiracy theories as to why he wasn't charged, most likely boils down to LE or prosecutorial incompetence.
715.
by jki275 6y ago
Many crimes do not require intent, they're strict liability. Some do.
716.
by jki275 6y ago
Ah, ok. Fair enough, I misunderstood what you were trying to do. Mingw on mac is evidently in homebrew. I've never used it, no idea how well it works. I don't write Windows software if I can ever help it.
717.
by jki275 6y ago
Why would you need mingw on a Mac?
718.
by jki275 6y ago
That's a fair point -- but I would argue Apple has always focused primarily on user experience , which often, but not always, aligns with graphical presentation and perfection. There are times -- and perhaps this is one -- where it ma
719.
by jki275 6y ago
I wouldn't call gaming relevant in the macOS sphere at all, really. Certainly in the mobile sphere it is, but there's not really any crossover to desktop OS X. There are games that run on OS X , but even for me as a relatively ha
720.
by jki275 6y ago
They're really not incompatible -- iPadOS is really just a reskinned macOS. Under the hood they're essentially the same thing. There won't be any phasing out of macOS -- it really wouldn't make any sense at all. They&#

More ›