jfyi

13 ms·

181.
by jfyi 1y ago
They found another processor, CCBill. That's what they figured out.
182.
by jfyi 1y ago
OnlyFans did manage to figure it out though. Maybe this is an opportunity for them to start a gaming division.
183.
by jfyi 1y ago
What did the processing fees on CCBill look like, or did you get that far?
184.
by jfyi 1y ago
Their point is it isn't just a couple companies arbitrarily making these decisions. It is a vast network of banks and merchant services companies. Ideally, you could take your business elsewhere. The problem is providers that handle th
185.
by jfyi 1y ago
It's not clear to me from the post what level this is happening on. I assume by "payment processor" that they are not talking about Visa et al themselves but their merchant services provider. The alternative to this is to fin
186.
by jfyi 1y ago
Sounds like a lot of work. I think I'll just fill it with pics of Hugh Jackman and take it as a an easy win.
187.
by jfyi 1y ago
I am still waiting for those 5 citations. Your last batch fell apart bad.
188.
by jfyi 1y ago
He's pretty entertaining really. You are correct of course, it's a serotonergic hallucinogen. https://www.erowid.org/psychoactives/chemistry/chemistry_com... There just may be a tiny bit of SAR going on
189.
by jfyi 1y ago
Are you familiar with Lavabit? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavabit It may not be directly equatable, but it's pretty close. How many providers do you think just rolled over and we never heard from?
190.
by jfyi 1y ago
I see you already addressed it but here let me give a scenario. Say the program was installed and set so the user didn't have privs to modify the executable (so an attacker couldn't just change it to do what they want). A buffer o
191.
by jfyi 1y ago
Ahhh, I can reply now! Would you like to give up? It's a bad look my man. See the other post for current status of this thread.
192.
by jfyi 1y ago
The very first one states the mushroom was misidentified. I'll assume from there you failed to read any of it. Edit: lol, here's the paper he cited and deleted: https://academic.oup.com/ndt/article-abstract&#x
193.
by jfyi 1y ago
Says the guy that demanded that I cite sources for something someone else said. You're too funny. Edit: The very first one on the now locked comment said he misidentified the mushroom in question. I'll assume from there you read n
194.
by jfyi 1y ago
He's kind of entertaining. I usually don't do this here and feel it's normally in bad taste, but he crumbles pretty spectacularly when pushed and I was curious how much material he had for me. You should see him ascribing nep
195.
by jfyi 1y ago
Which clearly exist only in your head. Disagree all you want, you failed to defend your point.
196.
by jfyi 1y ago
So, you have zero examples and I have thousands of years of use with no evidence of what you claim. Burden of proof is definitely on you.
197.
by jfyi 1y ago
I agree. I'd say it's simply that 20 years of software development isn't bottle necked by the ability to churn out code.
198.
by jfyi 1y ago
You cited the one case in recorded history which I already pointed out existed. It's not the data that's questionable but the circumstances. His two friends ate from the same batch and were fine. I'd say that counts squarely
199.
by jfyi 1y ago
So no citations then? Seems pretty trollish after making demands for citations just prior. So, just to be clear, you have no evidence of renal failure from psilocybe cubensis?
200.
by jfyi 1y ago
Why don't you show me 5 citations of renal failure from a confirmed psilocybe cubensis in the tens of thousands of years people have been eating them. Or... don't bother, the one you will find is questionable at best if you read p
201.
by jfyi 1y ago
>Amanita It's an entirely different class of hallucinogen. I don't have personal experience with it but I have done other dissociative hallucinogens and his take is likely largely true (though I wouldn't argue with someone
202.
by jfyi 1y ago
That theme was primarily explored through the idea it's impossible to live a truly ethical life in the modern world due to unknowable externalities. I don't think the takeaway was meant to really be about capitalism but more gener
203.
by jfyi 1y ago
I'd add: * Expand the House (and make provisions that keep it updated with each census). * Statehood for US territories. The systemic problems with our democracy seem pretty clear, really.
204.
by jfyi 1y ago
Google shows the injected LD50 of psilocybin in mice is 285 mg/kg. This dose is very much in the range that we should expect some deaths in their test group from overdose based on prior tests. Edit: The dose in the study was 15 mg&#x2F
205.
by jfyi 1y ago
Yeah, they are really on point... >Similarly, we refer to an abacus as “an abacus” rather than a digital computer, despite the fact that it relies on digital manipulation to effect its computations.
206.
by jfyi 1y ago
Yeah, you weren't going to win this. Most developers I've met would have approached this from one of the two extremes: "Lol, this is the obvious implementation." or "Lol, just use a boolean." That is to say, th
207.
by jfyi 1y ago
I largely get ads for things I already have bought. Otherwise, it's really general demographic stuff that doesn't strike a chord. I assume it's because I don't really browse for buyables unless I have the intent of buyin
208.
by jfyi 1y ago
It blatantly is, and the responses to you pointing that out are insane. Deflection, whataboutism, sealioning with a side of demanding sources for what is essentially the use of a greater than sign.
209.
by jfyi 2y ago
> trying to seem smart/clever Nobody that uses bit flags do it because they think it makes them look clever. If anything they believe it looks like using the most basic of tools. > One should not have to worry about solar flares!
210.
by jfyi 2y ago
Cryptography, parity checking, sorting, image processing, optimization...

More ›