3 ms·
Which clearly exist only in your head. Disagree all you want, you failed to defend your point.
by jfyi 1y ago
Which clearly exist only in your head. Disagree all you want, you failed to defend your point.
- Joel_Mckay 1y agotoo lazy... no longer care about your problems https://www.medlink.com/articles/neurologic-presentations-of-hallucinogenic-magic-mushroom-intoxication-and-poisoning https://www.medlink.com/articles/neurologic-presentations-of... https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1336442/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1336442/ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211753918301490 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221175391...
- jfyi 1y agoAhhh, I can reply now! Would you like to give up? It's a bad look my man. See the other post for current status of this thread.
- jfyi 1y agoThe very first one states the mushroom was misidentified. I'll assume from there you failed to read any of it. Edit: lol, here's the paper he cited and deleted: https://academic.oup.com/ndt/article-abstract/11/11/2324/1901452?redirectedFrom=PDF&login=false https://academic.oup.com/ndt/article-abstract/11/11/2324/190... The 4th one is the one you already admitted had bad data. At least one of the other two clearly states that the mushroom was unidentified. You will have to read or delete both.