Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jamiequint
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
Sure, here's a 40 year survey paper published in a top three economics journal which supports this with data: https://www.princeton.edu/~davidlee/wp/Longrununion.pdf Also I'm not sure what "supporti
62.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
That's a non sequitur, the existence or nonexistence of unions says nothing about human dignity.
63.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
You don't need a union to go after a company in violation of the NRLA ...
64.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
Unions almost never negotiate in the long-term interest of a business, they're collectively overly-short-term-focused cash/productivity drags on a business. If unions were truly long-term focused they'd be negotiating things
65.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
What's the principle? I should get anything I want for free as long as I can get away with it? I shouldn't have to pay for anything if I don't want to? Genuinely curious what the principled argument is here.
66.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
So pay if you hate it so much. Do you think people make the content for free?
67.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
Basic logic is hard for you, eh?
68.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
1. lol, wow a bunch of failing EV models whose sales were dying. Can you now compare the sales growth of the Leaf or Ford Focus electric to the Model S, or the later Model 3. The 3, S, and Y all signifiacantly raised the stakes for electric
69.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
lol, no I’m just capable of more nuanced thought than “Elon treats employees bad and sometimes says dumb things thus Elon bad and incapable of doing good things”
70.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
Ok dad. How about if people don’t want to get called stupid they don’t say wildly stupid things instead.
71.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
How many people's lives do you think would have been ruined by delaying the electrification of something that accounts for ~25% of worldwide greenhouse gas emissions by a decade or more?
72.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
Letting people take risks is not unethical as long as the risk is disclosed. Put your money where your mouth is and throw out all your electronics, which are definitely not assembled by workers who on average make more than the median house
73.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
If you look at what was going on in the electric car industry from 2003-2013 (heavy focus on plug in hybrids, very poor sales of the few existing EVs, etc) and compare the marketing strategy of the Model S and roadster to that of e.g. the N
74.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
Tesla accelerated the mass adoption of electric cars by at least a decade. Tesla’s workplace safety stats and their rate of progress are inextricably linked. If a 3x injury rate vs similar companies is cost of such progress, definitely wo
75.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
If you pull the “we need to have an ethics discussion” card about public data posted on a website you can quit anytime, you’re an insufferable whiner. Sorry not sorry.
76.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
The ethics argument is asinine. If you don’t like the rules, don’t use the product or start your own company. Just don’t be an insufferable whiner about it.
77.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
You can get mad all you want about people using “your data” that you posted on a public forum for whatever, doesn’t change the fact that you were dumb for thinking that your (not important, unique, or interesting) musings would be protected
78.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
Go through the GDPR deletion process if you care that much, will very likely be deleted because the fines are massive (4% of annual worldwide turnover)
79.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
Technically, not deleting your data would be a GDPR violation of the right to be forgotten. They could be ignoring that but it would be very expensive if they were found out. Probably doesn't apply to models that have already been trai
80.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
You're free to delete your content and your account if you're unhappy. There's nothing it "should" be, it's not your company. Also, it's pretty obvious that everyone was training on Twitter data already be
81.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
> The reason it's an auction house in the first place is because these ad networks have no clue in the slightest how valuable the ad space or any particular impression is and only care about user data collection inasmuch as it convi
82.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
lol, there are literally hundreds of billions of performance focused ad dollars a year chasing returns. If there is some hidden secret to running high-ROI ad campaigns without using the data that is locked up by Meta/Google etc, it
83.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
What do you think pays for the free and open internet? Or are you just well off enough that you don't have to care?
84.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
> Ad value is not intrinsically tied to the extraction of personal data Ad value may not be tied to the extraction of personal data, but it's unambiguously tied to the use of it. Obviously more targeted ads perform better.
85.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
Your security is not affected by you seeing bad ads.
86.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
Cool, has nothing to do with security. That’s a different point entirely.
87.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
This may be true on random-site-X on the internet, but is not true on sites like YouTube, Reddit, Twitch, Facebook, etc that run their own first-party ad platforms.
88.
▲
SQL is all you need
(jordivillar.com)
5 points
by
jamiequint
3y ago
|
1 comments
89.
▲
by
jamiequint
4y ago
Looks like #2
90.
▲
by
jamiequint
4y ago
My tweet was posted before that article.
More ›