Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jamiequint
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
jamiequint
6mo ago
It's so pipe-dreamy that I used it for an hour today through SF rush hour traffic. Clearly never going to work though, right? right???
32.
▲
by
jamiequint
6mo ago
It's not the same at all. Do you know how an IPO roadshow works at all or are you just spouting bullshit?
33.
▲
by
jamiequint
6mo ago
How would the stock be harmed by them selling better performing or more relevant ads?
34.
▲
by
jamiequint
6mo ago
In what way would that be securities fraud? I guess you could get nailed under Section 17(a), but really hard to make a case they're defrauding investors by representing they were going to make ads worse performing than they ended up m
35.
▲
by
jamiequint
6mo ago
Single example is worthless. Is there a pattern of this happening far more often? Overall, do fewer people get incorrectly arrested or detained as a result of this technology, or more.
36.
▲
by
jamiequint
6mo ago
By this same argument ANY police makes life hard for regular people because they sometimes fuck up, so let's just get rid of police too. What's the worst that could happen.
37.
▲
by
jamiequint
6mo ago
Untrue at a population level, just compare anxiety disorders and self-reported anxiety between USA and China.
38.
▲
by
jamiequint
6mo ago
"This just looks like a pitch to investors" The goal of public companies is generally to generate profit for their investors.
39.
▲
by
jamiequint
6mo ago
"Cameras don't fix homelessness or addiction or underfunded services. They just make life harder for regular people." In what way do cameras make life harder for regular people? If anything rampant crime (and progressive lega
40.
▲
by
jamiequint
6mo ago
What is an "obvious reason" one might not want to log into X? I can't think of any rational reason.
41.
▲
by
jamiequint
6mo ago
Yes? It's the data source, not a third-party. How is this even a question?
42.
▲
by
jamiequint
6mo ago
Here is the actual link, not a link to some weird third-party site that can't be trusted. https://x.com/RonanFarrow/status/2041127882429206532
43.
▲
by
jamiequint
6mo ago
If you become massively rich from working somewhere, then suddenly discover your conscience when you're fired, you're bitter, not principled.
44.
▲
by
jamiequint
6mo ago
No, principled would be refusing to sign the exit agreement and forefeiting the money, then writing the book.
45.
▲
by
jamiequint
6mo ago
Better paying, way higher leverage.
46.
▲
by
jamiequint
7mo ago
This is cool, like qmd as a service with real-time integrations where it matters? How do you handle more structured data like csv/xlsx/json? Would be cool if it were possible to auto-process links to markdown (e.g. youtube, podcas
47.
▲
by
jamiequint
8mo ago
WTF is this garbage site?
48.
▲
by
jamiequint
11mo ago
The reality is until the median consumer cares about how their data is used (aka probably never) that your only choice is to not use products who use data in a way you don't like.
49.
▲
by
jamiequint
1y ago
Wrong. The problems come from regulation itself. From bureaucracies that freeze innovation, protect incumbents, and smother experimentation under compliance costs, etc.
50.
▲
by
jamiequint
1y ago
The author clearly hates Thiel and spends most of the essay mocking Thiel and his ideas without actually engaging with the ideas. The author’s essay is itself meandering, dense with digressions and snide parentheticals. He faults Thiel for
51.
▲
by
jamiequint
1y ago
Why is this on HN? Did you get lost on the way to /r/politics?
52.
▲
by
jamiequint
2y ago
Under what circumtances is the US allowed to pull out of a war they didn't start, which does not directly involve any US interests, in which we have already invested $110bn? Never? Not until we spend another $500bn we don't have?
53.
▲
by
jamiequint
2y ago
It is an absurd position that the US should be on the hook to indefinitely pay for any war anywhere in the world forever, and if they attempt to negotiate peace while pulling out of that war that they are siding with the opposition.
54.
▲
by
jamiequint
2y ago
There's a difference between "siding with Russia" and siding with negotiated peace. Many people seem to think that the US, and to a lesser extent the EU, should fund this war indefinitely. However, the US clearly does not ben
55.
▲
by
jamiequint
2y ago
Some interesting discussion in the author's X thread here: https://x.com/zzlccc/status/1887557022771712308
56.
▲
by
jamiequint
2y ago
First, VCs don't get paid when "dogshit startups" get acquired, they get paid when they have true outlier successes. It's the only way to reliably make money in the VC business. Second, want to give any examples of "
57.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
I hope not, have you used both apps? Texts is much more stable and easy to use than Beeper in my experience.
58.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
Building an actually successful business is the most pro-user thing any company can do.
59.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
"it clashes with deep values of the people who aren't shareholders, but are no doubt vested in the product the company produces, mainly the customers. It ignores their needs completely because they don't own stock." Pres
60.
▲
by
jamiequint
3y ago
Changed to link the actual PDF of the study. I don't think you understand what the price of a stock means ...
More ›