3 ms·
The author clearly hates Thiel and spends most of the essay mocking Thiel and his ideas without actually engaging with the ideas. The author’s essay is itself m
by jamiequint 1y ago
The author clearly hates Thiel and spends most of the essay mocking Thiel and his ideas without actually engaging with the ideas. The author’s essay is itself meandering, dense with digressions and snide parentheticals. He faults Thiel for grandstanding and over-referencing but indulges in the same. Waste of time.
- OhioMan2943 1y ago[flagged]
- jhatemyjob 1y ago[flagged]
- ggm 1y ago> The masses don't deserve to hear what he has to say. That's a very strange thing to say, unless the sarcasm meter was missing. If Thiel's views are only for the cognoscenti, then I think we have bigger problems to talk about.
- jhatemyjob 1y ago[flagged]
- ggm 1y ago[flagged]
- Hansappreciator 1y ago[flagged]
- andsoitis 1y ago> Thiel is clearly out of his depth, unless we're going to pretend he's an informed Bible scholar now. And he's clearly not, since the Antichrist as a figure is an evangelical creation about 150 years old and is not in the Bible at all. You, my friend, are ill-informed. The idea of the antichrist has deep and complex origins that developed over centuries, blending Jewish apocalyptic expectations, early Christian theology, and later medieval interpretation. John 2:18 — “Children, it is the last hour; and as you have heard that Antichrist is coming, so now many antichrists have come.” 1 John 4:3 — “This is the spirit of the Antichrist, which you heard was coming and now is in the world already.”
- Larrikin 1y agoWhat point are you proving by quoting fiction?
- andsoitis 1y agoI responded to someone who said “Antichrist” isn’t in the bible by quoting it from said book. So they are ill-informed.
- wzdd 1y agoGGP didn’t say “Antichrist” wasn’t in the bible. They said that antichrist “as a figure” wasn’t in the bible. Even the Wikipedia article on Antichrist will give you a rich overview of this discussion and general scholarly agreement that that word as used in the bible does not reference a specific figure. There is quite a lot of nuance here. You can’t just keyword search.
- andsoitis 1y agoMany (most?) of the characters in the Bible are mythological… Even if some are rooted in some real person, the stories about them etc. cannot be considered accurate historical accounts.
- EasyMark 1y agoWhen you start with the antichrist as a real person and contemporary threat everything that comes after is gonna fall apart. I agree with RFK on ultraprocessed foods and weightlifting, the health benefits of which are well-established by science; but I'm not going to agree with him on dismantling the FDA, ending vaccinations for everything, and that germ theory is a scientific conspiracy.