3 ms·
>There's nothing deterministic about weather, so hopefully you're not just being disingenuous. You're the one being disingenuous. Look at what you wrote. > Is
by imtringued 11d ago
>There's nothing deterministic about weather, so hopefully you're not just being disingenuous.
You're the one being disingenuous. Look at what you wrote.
> Is AI less deterministic than an airline dealing with weather?
You didn't talk about how deterministic the weather is. You talked about how an airline responds to a weather event in comparison to AI, which means that it's about responding to presented information by making a decision.
The state of the weather does affect your micro decisions, but the rules you follow are the same every time and the rules are as deterministic as possible even if they rely on pilot intuition.
- CPLX 11d ago> rules are as deterministic as possible even if they rely on pilot intuition I think you are profoundly confused. An airplane, and an AI algorithm encoded into silicon, are inert physical objects. Every evaluation we are doing here is of a complex system that involves the interaction of people and machines and physical connections and so on. An aviation system connected to every country and region with millions of people and machines involved is no less complex than what’s under discussion here and no more deterministic. We don’t regulate airplanes because they aren’t people. We regulate pilots and mechanics and leaders of the companies that make and own them. The task at hand is to regulate the people involved in AI to get the outcomes we want.
- deleted 11d ago[deleted]