Correct, when you think about it, all the "world is designed for humans" statements inherently assume that humans are still needed for the specific task to be a

Correct, when you think about it, all the "world is designed for humans" statements inherently assume that humans are still needed for the specific task to be automated. For example, we bolt robot arms on tables, so that the work space is at a comfortable height for humans, but if the robot arm had the exact same intuition and intelligence as a human, you could just install it onto the floor. Suddenly the entire rationale, the table, which is the representative stand-in for "the world was designed for humans" is gone. It's not that we necessarily need a specialized machine, it's that a generalized machine doesn't have to be humanoid.