Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ikeboy
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
18 ms
·
121.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
Ah yes, technically the chemicals are being put in the water and are turning the frogs gay but you see, they only intended to put the chemicals in the water and didn't specifically intend to turn the frogs gay.
122.
▲
In Houston’s Zoom court proceedings, decorum often gets muted
(houstonchronicle.com)
1 points
by
ikeboy
6y ago
|
0 comments
123.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
Thanks. I just went and submitted one.
124.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
They pointed me to an obscure page on their site that implies but doesn't directly say that this might happen. I don't know the laws, have to do more research.
125.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
Robinhood closed out an option spread I had deep in the money with no notice, citing some kind of risk. I get a notification that "my" order executed two minutes before market closed, I immediately contact Robinhood saying that I
126.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
>Update 2020-12-22 20:00 UTC: Tor Browser 10.0.7 is approved now on Google Play and it is rolling out. Quite curious if this hitting the HN frontpage had anything to do with it. Probably, based on the timing.
127.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
You're right, I just successfully updated Tor Browser with an apk. In the past I've had errors updating other apps, presumably because they used Google's signing services, I assumed it was the same for all apps but was wrong.
128.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
But you can't install over an existing app from Google Play. You need to uninstall the app, lose your data, then reinstall with an apk. Edit: above is wrong at least for Tor Browser, you can install over an existing Google Play install
129.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
>This release updates Firefox for desktops to 78.6.0esr and Firefox for Android to 84.1.0. This release includes important security updates to Firefox for Desktop, and similar important security updates to Firefox for Android. >Note:
130.
▲
Google Play rejected Tor Browser update with security fixes
(blog.torproject.org)
334 points
by
ikeboy
6y ago
|
122 comments
131.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
Having coded with MWS, I can confirm. I don't remember the details but there was a typo in one of the PHP examples leading all API calls to fail. Easily fixed but should I really have to edit the provided example code to get something
132.
▲
Physicists Prove Anyons Exist, a Third Type of Particle in the Universe
(discovermagazine.com)
34 points
by
ikeboy
6y ago
|
4 comments
133.
▲
NASA's Juno Spacecraft Updates Quarter-Century Jupiter Mystery
(jpl.nasa.gov)
2 points
by
ikeboy
6y ago
|
0 comments
134.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.13544 Underlying paper here. Originally published several months ago and updated with more information last week.
135.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
No. All events being probabilistic is still realism, just in a weaker sense than Bell.
136.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
Citation?
137.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
Where are you getting that from? It's 10%, i.e. roughly one police killing per 10 civilian killings. Read the article I linked and compare to other countries as well as historically.
138.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
Then why have police killings gone up despite crime going down? Also, why are police dispatched for non-violent crimes? I don't think someone with a gun and a license for violence should be sent out for any report of a non violent crim
139.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
"why isn't there as much outrage over the few dozen police killed every year as there is over the nearly 2k people killed by police?" There are roughly 20k violent deaths in the US every year. Almost 10% of those are police r
140.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
No two people ever have the same set of information. And very few cases are even as clean as the coin case. A more typical example is using polls to predict elections. 538's model ended with Biden around 90% to win. Andrew Gelman'
141.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
Bob has a very simple algorithm to output probabilities. He just answers 50/50 for any yes or no question. This is reproducible. Is this objective?
142.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
Sure, it's as real as those other examples, i.e. not particularly except insofar as it affects peoples' expectations. I don't think "exact info of conditions" is objective or coherent. This pre-supposes there's
143.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
I don't think that's a coherent concept. It's not clear how one can assert that a particular model of reality is "correct" outside of any predictions than it makes.
144.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
Bell's theorem rules out local realism. I view realism as incoherent, so I'm certainly not committed to local realism.
145.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
The distinction between objective and subjective collapses under your usage.
146.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
>Interestingly, someone only observing results of a probabilistic event will eventually learn to predict events with an accuracy approaching ideal This relies on various unstated assumptions. I would deny the assumption that an event can
147.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
Generally we use the term real to refer to objective claims and consider subjective claims not to be real. You can certainly use the term real in a broader sense if you'd like. I don't think the concept of reality is particularly
148.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
Probability is not real. Probability is subjective, it depends on what you know, and everyone has a different set of things they know. I flip a coin and look at it, then ask two other people for their probabilities. One of them knows the co
149.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
>The proposal to delay deletion for 24 hours is content neutral, is it not? My response to that part was that it's consistent with Section 230 as well as long as it doesn't have to be displayed publicly. If the requirement is t
150.
▲
by
ikeboy
6y ago
Turner is about a content-neutral regulation. The proposal in OP doesn't appear to be content-neutral. It's also weaker than Turner in that no compelling government interest is identified. Being charitable doesn't mean I need
More ›