2 ms·
>The proposal to delay deletion for 24 hours is content neutral, is it not? My response to that part was that it's consistent with Section 230 as well as long
by ikeboy 6y ago
>The proposal to delay deletion for 24 hours is content neutral, is it not?
My response to that part was that it's consistent with Section 230 as well as long as it doesn't have to be displayed publicly.
If the requirement is to display it publicly, then I suspect platforms will respond by adding a delay before content is published in the first place, or restricting distribution while leaving the content up (so you'd need to go directly to that page to see it.)
- emn13 6y agoYeah, that requirement doesn't look like it'd be worth much; for sure. Also, 24 hours is really short; even if the requirement were maximally broad to the extent that would surely attract a challenge, there's a good chance many people wouldn't see that notice until right around the end of that period, or even later - so what's the point? They surely can't meaningfully respond in that time frame, and even if the odd person did, the receiving platform might not process that response in time...