4 ms·
Ah yes, technically the chemicals are being put in the water and are turning the frogs gay but you see, they only intended to put the chemicals in the water and
by ikeboy 6y ago
Ah yes, technically the chemicals are being put in the water and are turning the frogs gay but you see, they only intended to put the chemicals in the water and didn't specifically intend to turn the frogs gay.
- katmannthree 6y agoAtrazine isn't intentionally put into water, it ending up in water reservoirs is a second order effect of its primary use as an herbicide. Its subsequent tertiary effects on the ecosystem are far removed from the people who applied it, who were just looking for an easy way to kill weeds.
- petermcneeley 6y agoThat is a misquote. He implied human social engineering potentially as a side effect. https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Alex_Jones https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Alex_Jones
- MattGaiser 6y agoThe chemicals are not being intentionally put in the water at all. They are sprayed onto plants and then run off into the water. Atrazine is a herbicide.
- ikeboy 6y agoFair point, so the intentionality is one level back