iinnPP

25 ms·

361.
by iinnPP 3y ago
I don't think I have ever seen another person exit a public restroom using a barrier of some sort to prevent touching the door/handle. I certainly do it, though I'm not actually sure if it matters or not. In my city's ma
362.
by iinnPP 3y ago
Probably a very very small sum if not zero. I can also think of far superior methods of obtaining a list of gay or gay supporting people. Like any number of data breaches would provide access to. Hell, I can uncover that data on 90% of Cana
363.
by iinnPP 3y ago
I would certainly hope so. I get your point however. The article is counting on outrage from people who can't understand the term watching. I watch the news without being a newscaster. I watch NHL without being a pro athlete.
364.
by iinnPP 3y ago
My wife(I being her husband) and I both watch LGBTQIA2S+ content on TikTok. Watching content doesn't mean anything other than that you are watching content. Edit: Breaking: Water is wet, tonight at 11.
365.
by iinnPP 3y ago
Absolutely. That is the today impact. What about when it's Waymo One or Uber Zero. Support is GPT7 Two. No call center jobs, no driving jobs, less supporting jobs, less money flow, more homelessness, more violence. Decreasing compensat
366.
by iinnPP 3y ago
Market dominance would still allow for it to be profitable. Is money to goal or is it a better society? Less pollution, less waste, more social interaction, and increased safety. Less colored paper. Surely the government has an interest in
367.
by iinnPP 3y ago
Not just financial either. When more people are perpetually online in an internet populated by an even larger population of bots designed for engagement, what happens? Many of the jobs you are referring to are socially fulfilling to some pe
368.
by iinnPP 3y ago
act as the social aspect that will be missing. To act as a local for a traveler. To recommend locations To do nothing but sit there and look at their device or read Or perhaps the answer is a tax on automation and everyone can sit at home p
369.
by iinnPP 3y ago
It would be volunteers running the service that are unaffiliated with the software that was taken down. Ideally in another country.
370.
by iinnPP 3y ago
I grew up in foster care. One of my guardians made a living driving a taxi. The guy was an absolute wreck of a human and I probably wouldn't break if he was crossing. It was what he used to survive though, and surely not all cab driver
371.
by iinnPP 3y ago
I just had a thought that could potentially work against DMCA, but am admittedly not super knowledgeable so perhaps someone from HN can verify the validity of the idea. Given certain genres of software being more prone to DMCA than others,
372.
by iinnPP 3y ago
I agree but also worry about the job loss and the inevitable loss of freedoms that will inevitably be 'justifiable' when automatic driving is the norm. Basically, if the cost can be comparable to car ownership, reducing resource u
373.
by iinnPP 3y ago
I am also an extremely happy ex-paid-Gmail user that is now paying Fastmail for a far superior experience in Email. One benefit has been the ease in which I can handle spam and undesirables. Everything is now coming to one inbox and anythin
374.
by iinnPP 3y ago
I have used Gmails paid offering since it was available and have not had ads outside of the spam emails I make outside of the premium experience. Recently I swapped to Fastmail. There is no actual comparison. It's so much better for my
375.
by iinnPP 3y ago
The group behind the complaint is Egale. The website for which couldn't be bothered with even basic accessibility requirements. None of which are difficult. The statement in question is also not entirely inaccurate. My entire friend gr
376.
by iinnPP 4y ago
In a world where only headlines are read, and the article is behind a paywall, where "50%" of Americans don't trust the media we have this article. The AI Chatbot has no feelings. None. Incapable.
377.
by iinnPP 4y ago
So what about everyone else not making 200K plus options?
378.
by iinnPP 4y ago
Maybe it was written by a hallucinating chatbot.
379.
by iinnPP 4y ago
How does one use HN with a whitelist?
380.
by iinnPP 4y ago
I am left wondering then what information takes priority, if any. It has 4 dates to choose from and 3 timeframes of information. A set of programming to counter people being malicious is also there to add to the party. You do seem correct a
381.
by iinnPP 4y ago
I said confidently right.
382.
by iinnPP 4y ago
Plausible. It seems to me the chatbot would have picked that up though. There's a huge incentive to make this seem true as well. That said, I'm exercising an abundance of caution with chatbots. As I do with humans. Motive is there
383.
by iinnPP 4y ago
Frankly? What about looking for specific 2010 knowledge? It's not useless and it's not fair to say it is, frankly.
384.
by iinnPP 4y ago
That is a great approach for me to look into. Thanks for sharing.
385.
by iinnPP 4y ago
"I can give you reasons to believe why it is 2022. If you will let me guide you." Did I read that wrong? Maybe.
386.
by iinnPP 4y ago
Training data is 2021.
387.
by iinnPP 4y ago
Ok. I don't have access to confirm this is how it works. Did Microsoft change the date limit on the training data though? ChatGPT doesn't have 2022 data. From 2021, that movie isn't out yet. ChatGPT doesn't understand ma
388.
by iinnPP 4y ago
The user prompt indicates an intention to convince the chatbot it is 2022, not 2023. Screenshots can obviously be faked.
389.
by iinnPP 4y ago
I thought the consensus was that Google search was awful and rarely produced a result to the question asked. I certainly get that a lot myself when using Google search. I have also had ChatGPT outperform Google in some aspects, and faceplan
390.
by iinnPP 4y ago
Thanks for that. I didn't know about Mondragon, but given the size it's a subject I am now very interested in.

More ›