Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
hashkb
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
61.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
I think you misread that comment as anger; it's satire. Your response hoists you even further by your own petard.
62.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
Not common. As in, strictly less than half.
63.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
And yet, all the upvotes showered on nitpicks again prevent HN from using the top comment for substantive discussion on the subject of the article.
64.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
I found it so awkward to configure authorization and to apply custom logic that I went crawling back to Rails to get my current project shipped. For me, the value of a graphql API just isn't enough to move me. Typescript all the way d
65.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
> How could we increase our leverage? A union and a strike.
66.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
I skip all the middle-men and assume everyone is wrong, regardless of reputation OR content.
67.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
They'll also go through your recent history and downvote any comments you've made that are still fresh enough. Downvote culture has some clear drawbacks that I have never seen validated, let alone addressed, by any community mod&#
68.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
Hmmm... No takers. Telling.
69.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
The question is about lock-in and choice. You can see on the thread the Observable authors seem almost proud of the fact that their tooling is so good that it couldn't possibly ever be made to be more compatible with everyone else'
70.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
/s takes all the fun out of it. If someone initially thinks I'm serious, someone else gets an opportunity to explain a joke, which is a rare pleasure. But of course we all know confronting someone directly about their opinion alw
71.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
Oh, I'm definitely, genuinely a fool. For ever trying to get a point across on the internet.
72.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
Sorry it wasn't clear. I tried to be as extreme as possible to avoid being taken seriously. (Although I guess these days that works the other way.)
73.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
Yes, as someone who only occasionally uses a Mac, I always think Safari is broken until I remember Apple tries to hide everything from you for your own good.
74.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
> I'm not much into indulging the ridiculous whims of self important people. Then you probably wouldn't be working at a concert venue / on a showbusiness production team anyway. Edit: have you seen a Van Halen (or, really,
75.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
Were you saying something racist? I'm just asking.
76.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
The baseline assumption is that they read your contract and do everything. It's their job to get it right. If they're attentive to the stupidest thing in your contract, they probably did an OK job on everything else. Sure, it&#
77.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
It's more than just load, it's all the little hangs. Especially with devtools open. Also unlike Chrome, one tab can crash every window, which can happen to me daily. Edit: I suppose that's what you meant by "responsive&q
78.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
I've found the opposite, especially for development. I use ff 99% of the time and it's slower and crashier than Chrome by an order of magnitude at least. Using ff because Google is evil, and suffering for it. (Arch Linux, sway, 5y
79.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
I used to enjoy a mix of going to the office and working from home. It doesn't have to be one or the other. It's nice to feel respected and trusted to make the decision myself, and if someone asked me to be somewhere I usually wou
80.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
I'd put money (a few thousand USD) up against anyone who can fool me that I'm playing on my rig when I'm not. It's a very simple rig. Because that'd be valuable if I ever lost and I'd collect up until I did.
81.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
Also, the competition is not against vintage analog gear. Modern analog gear is having a true Renaissance, and this community can afford to support the Wampler's of the world. I don't understand the modelling camp at all, their st
82.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
Can any skeptics weigh in? To me, this kind of tech is centuries away from fooling tone hounds.
83.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
I'm not saying they don't need to be focused. There are lots of ways to proactively ask for what you need that are more likely to get you and your needs respected, rather than this very common expression of frustration.
84.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
I care about both. And it's a tough balance sometimes, but I try to always be available and still get the work done.
85.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
Sorry you had five bad bosses. I'm talking about standing strategy meetings, not stand-ups.
86.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
Inevitably, the "no meetings, no interruptions" devs are the same people complaining they don't have a voice in the larger org and that business doesn't care about their opinions. But no, they can't do a weekly 30 m
87.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
Maybe you should collaborate with someone instead of insisting that you must be left alone without interruptions to succeed. Or maybe you (aren't garbage but) need more practice.
88.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
After sharing this view for many years, I now realize how selfish it is. Now that I am a consultant working directly for entrepreneurs, it's clear that my job is to both deliver software AND to be as available as possible. You can buil
89.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
So you completely ignore the reputation of whoever is trying to convince you of something?
90.
▲
by
hashkb
5y ago
Across the board, correcting and confronting people, no matter how you do it, leads them to double down, in most cases. Source: reality.
More ›