hardwires

4 ms·

1.
by hardwires 9y ago
I'm sorry, your analysis is incorrect. I'm not talking about this fantastic new hate-speech law per se, I'm talking about the broader attitude in Germany where we just expect foreign business to gratefully deal with all of ou
2.
by hardwires 9y ago
>> Yeah, once upon a time, murder was legal, and people weren't "murdering illegally", so why the need for a law against murder? The POINT is that the parent claimed Facebook is acting illegally , my point is they wer
3.
by hardwires 9y ago
>> Art. 20 II of our constitution. That's the philosophical foundation of how our state works. Every state action is derived from that principle. That's of course no nonsense but thankfully absolutely unchallenged by everybo
4.
by hardwires 9y ago
>> I don't like all our laws either (this included) but I accept that as a society we must respect and enforce the laws we democratically choose to enact. No, we don't. Who taught you this nonsense? In fact, it is our duty a
5.
by hardwires 9y ago
>> Not appearing in court when a judge orders you to is not legal. That's not actually true.
6.
by hardwires 9y ago
>> So? Now, there is a law, and so what was legal before is not anymore. That's my whole point, it was legal before and they weren't "making money illegally" (as the parent claimed), hence my the need for new law
7.
by hardwires 9y ago
>> Now, that is an interesting interpretation of the rule of law if I have ever seen one! That isn't an "interpretation of the rule of law", that's a response to the bold statement that "We really need to teac
8.
by hardwires 9y ago
>> We really need to teach Facebook, Twitter, Uber, AirBNB and all those companies some manners and respect for our society. As a German, let me tell you that this sounds absolutely ridiculous, arrogant and hubristic. You want your Ge
9.
by hardwires 9y ago
>> If the data you used to reach a conclusion is fundamentally flawed, it's pretty disingenuous to claim you stand by the sentiment. So they started with a conclusion, set out to prove it, later found the data they used to prove
10.
by hardwires 9y ago
It's not being "wiped out", it's being scaled down to sustainable levels. If "the authorities" protect price levels for every job that is in a larger supply than demand, that money goes straight out of the pock