hans1729

36 ms·

331.
by hans1729 7y ago
Write less code, and read more (code by others) instead. Learn different languages (especially functional ones, I can recommend Elixir). It'll inspire you to see different paradigms. Think about well defined functions, modularity, simp
332.
by hans1729 7y ago
Replace your query-term with "to-do" and google will yield plenty of results
333.
by hans1729 7y ago
I mean, he lists "functional" as a pro and a con, using a fancy font for emphasis. Like another commenter posted: guy seems very opinionated, but his article lacks any profound stance on... anything? Oof
334.
by hans1729 7y ago
> Haskell and every other functional-oriented programming language in its class, such as elixir, erlang, most lisps, even if they resent being lumped together Was nice talking to you, have a good day mate
335.
by hans1729 7y ago
I read it as "Lots of people tried to reinvent the wheel because they thought it's easy, but it isn't - it's complex and expensive. We're here because we realized that. Work with us so you have less work and we get
336.
by hans1729 7y ago
That's not really the point, is it? The point is that the upgraded version ships with less features . I use bluetooth-headphones so I don't care, but I can easily see why this is infuriating to others.
337.
by hans1729 7y ago
We do in GPUs, which is where thread-heavy computation is at these days.
338.
by hans1729 7y ago
agi :-)
339.
by hans1729 7y ago
From the stream: Lauches September 19th. Interesting approach: one subscription for 4.99/month (for "the whole family"), with a set of arcade-exclusive releases. Seems like a good way to generate continuous revenue, no?
340.
by hans1729 7y ago
but.. it's all data! (check 'every clojure talk ever' if you don't get the ref, it's hilarious)
341.
by hans1729 7y ago
Eh, depends on what you want to build? I'm pretty fond of scala and clojure (jvm duh) or elixir (erlang duh), but that's preference at best
342.
by hans1729 7y ago
This is glorious, I just found a friend and we nodded at each other for a good while. Then I walked through the next best wall and lured others out, since they can still see the beam indicating the direction of my view. Thanks for this!
343.
by hans1729 7y ago
Oh hey, it's my new friend on the internet! Keep up the great work, your site is a pleasure to read :-) btw, there's a typo under 2./Cognifying: >7 billing human
344.
by hans1729 7y ago
>yes /thread
345.
by hans1729 7y ago
I mean, we wouldn't have this without arch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ngwv_r-zzI0 (George Hotz livestreaming himself installing arch, just for the sake of it) Watched it while having half a bottle of merlot, _eas
346.
by hans1729 7y ago
IIRC, Google Maps is still opt-in (opposed to "Maps"), at least it was when I got my phone ~3 years ago
347.
by hans1729 7y ago
I can't really disagree with this, but am left in conflict: Information should be free, but shouldn't companies be free to a) negotiate in their own best interested b) use NDAs?
348.
by hans1729 7y ago
But it's an opinion at best. Unless it's your profession to evaluate the entire process, you're not in a position to claim it as a fact, thus it's hot air. Of course there is a difference between really great and average
349.
by hans1729 7y ago
Emotional is the right word, yeah. At first I thought "ah, guess you gotta write a medium-article when you get a job these days, good for the resume eh", but this lad really got me more sugar: >#8) Last one — always trust your
350.
by hans1729 7y ago
>#1) [...] it took /a lot/ of applications [...] I don’t have the actual numbers ..ok? >#2) Tech interviews are just stupid broken [...] ..ok? >I was /never/ offered feedback. Not once! [...] This sucks. You&#x2
351.
by hans1729 7y ago
>On Wall Street, that is. /thread