Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
h_anna_h
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
61.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
I will be moving to nixos.
62.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
Previously about Snopes: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21516283
63.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
I really wish they would avoid stating this belief of theirs as a fact. I do not enjoy being told what I should think. Just get straight to the topic instead.
64.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
> However, you can change the conversation settings not to do that. Can I do that without the other party knowing or being able to override it? I would check it myself but signal requires a phone number so I can't.
65.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2021-2... https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2021-2... https://www.mozilla.org/en-US&#x
66.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
I am not aware of any distribution that does not disable the in-firefox updates.
67.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
https://packages.debian.org/sid/firefox disagrees however. Your link is about the source package.
68.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
Debian stable you mean. I am talking about unstable.
69.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
Isn't it something that the sender decides?
70.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
Meanwhile debian unstable is still on version 88, there hasn't even been an update to patch the various security vulns.
71.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
> and locking accounts after too many failed attempts (either per account This is not a best practice, this is a DoS.
72.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
You would think that in our "great" and "fair" legal system simply scrapping a legal site would not be enough to ruin your life. Especially if no harm was done and no intention of harm was there.
73.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
Not sure what your point is. The general scientific consensus so far seems to be that there is no evidence to justify the need for people who already had COVID to get vaccinated. If anything it is worse, as only around 15% of the world popu
74.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
You are correct, however vincnetas made the comparison between distributing CSAM and buying drugs, it is not aemreunal's fault, you are replying to the wrong person. A comparison that would make better sense would be to compare these i
75.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
They are putting disproportionately and unjustifiably lot of effort in trying to verify the safety of the vaccine for children compared to teens or older. It should have been available for them along with the rest of the population. The arg
76.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
It is lovely when your "own" device is working against you to catch if you are in possession of illegal numbers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_number . And surely we can trust Apple that it will only be
77.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
My suggestion is that this should be changed.
78.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
> vaccines have not been approved for those younger than 12 And I suggest that this should be changed. Chill and try to be less toxic please. You don't know if I have taken or not the vaccine so please don't assume.
79.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
The usual argument for mandatory vaccination is for the protection of others rather than the protection of oneself, so the effectiveness of the vaccine in preventing death in children should not matter.
80.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
Don't put unvaxxed and these who were injured/became ill due to their own incompetence or recklessness in an ICU bed then? (as long as they are full that is) > and someone is going to have to take up the work. There is a lot of
81.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
The point is the comparison between the life of others vs the "right to bodily self-determination".
82.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
> * vaccinated people can still have children who are not vaccinated They should just vaccinate them then. I don't see why it is fine for the children to be unvaccinated but not for tomp.
83.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
I guess soon enough I will not be able to have open more than a few pages of wikipedia at the same time.
84.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
This is a concerning argument. We have laws regarding labor for a reason. "I just decided to pay you below the minimum wage and not give you any days off" has not been considered acceptable for decades despite the employees being
85.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
Less of this argument please. I would not like companies to have the choice to fire racial minorities just because it is "their company, their choice". Edit: Protected classes is a legal term and is irrelevant to the topic here. I
86.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
Why are people so obsessed with kids? Afaik, covid is generally much softer on them, older people tend to be in higher danger.
87.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
Do they actually reduce spread or do they instead just make people who catch it more likely to avoid hospitalization and increase their survival chances? If it is the first I can see why they do it, if it is the second then I do not see the
88.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
To be pedantic, only the ones that posses the binary need the source code for something to be open source. Since they did not publish the binary and since they have the source code we could say that it is actually open source software.
89.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
By accessing our website you give up the right to your house.
90.
▲
by
h_anna_h
5y ago
The CompCert C reference interpreter aborts execution on undefined behavior. > To be clear, when we talk about "an alternative implementation of C", it needs to give similar performance and other properties (e.g. function and d
More ›