3 ms·
Less of this argument please. I would not like companies to have the choice to fire racial minorities just because it is "their company, their choice". Edit: P
by h_anna_h 5y ago
Less of this argument please. I would not like companies to have the choice to fire racial minorities just because it is "their company, their choice".
Edit: Protected classes is a legal term and is irrelevant to the topic here. If your argument can be used to support a statement or action that you consider incorrect or immoral then it is not a good argument. After all "Their company, their choice." has in fact been used in the past in order to discriminate against minorities.
But feel free to replace "racial minorities" with a non-protected class such as "blonde people".
Edit2: "You can choose to be vaccinated (minus the obvious medical exceptions), you can't choose your minority status."
This is again irrelevant to the topic. I am arguing against the hypocritical "their company, their choice" argument. This new argument is even worse because similarly one can say the disgusting "you can choose to bleach your skin if your company does not like black people".
- fooey 5y agoMinorities are a protected class. That argument has no bearing at all on this subject.
- some-guy 5y agoYou can choose to be vaccinated (minus the obvious medical exceptions), you can't choose your minority status.
- jakebasile 5y agoOf course you can, a minority is determined by population. There are other populations to move to where any given human would no longer be in the minority. This is the same argument being presented here: the employees can just choose to work for another employer.