h_anna_h

5 ms·

1.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
I do not believe that you went through my comment history in the few minutes that it took for you to respond to me. Also, something that I did not mention before > ...but that your views are considered problematic by quite a lot of peopl
2.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
> and having randos holding knives knocking on people's windows Are you referring to some specific event?
3.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
4chan is not only /pol/. The culture between boards is vastly different. Although I do not disagree, /pol/ specifically is toxic. And it's not as if reddit does not have its own share of similar forums.
4.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
Yes? I thought that you did not assume good faith from me. I did not think that you were not acting in good faith.
5.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
People on 4chan will call you slurs and insults but it is never personal, part of it is due to the anonymous nature. People here will be personally vicious and hostile. > ...but that your views are considered problematic by quite a lot o
6.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
Huh? I am not talking about twitch. If anything this just shows that you disagree with https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28771025 which is the post that I am replying to.
7.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
Not really, I would go as far as to argue that it is less toxic than reddit, twitter, and even HN.
8.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
What about competition? Or well, not acting evil.
9.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
> Sure, but this fragmentation isn't exactly new. There have always been multiple toolkits on Linux I think that we got a little bit sidetracked. "I want my users to be able to be able to select what borders to have" ->
10.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
> It does, the user can choose to use GTK or Qt apps. That's... not what I meant by it. I find this dangerous as it encourages duplicate work for minor differences. I would rather not have to make both a GTK and a Qt version of my p
11.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
There have been various in https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141154 , first one in 2011 I believe. There are a few more not mentioned there, such as https://github.com/Dudemanguy/gtk and https
12.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
> I don't want that when I'm making apps. If I'm making a GTK app then I would expect to get the GTK borders. If I'm making a Qt app then I would expect to get the Qt borders. And so on. Surely the choice should fall
13.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
Patches for it have been submitted but they were never merged. Some users even patch gtk themselves.
14.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
People were actually annoyed when they replaced the normal search with the new recursive one, so I doubt it.
15.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
> No one in the thread could post one so far. This is false, I posted this before: > Just look at all these people who went to jail for crimes related to illegal numbers (eg. piracy). Or people like Mildred Gillars. Or the various whi
16.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
These are not really corner cases but whatever man, you believe what you want.
17.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
Mind you, tor had basically the same issue a while ago https://archive.is/4FMxm
18.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
No, rather, it asks from you to assume good faith from me.
19.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
> In the US, an idea can't be a "terrorist organization". In Germany, it can be This is false.
20.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
> If you voluntarily agree to not leak secrets and do so anyway its not protected under free speech Of course it is. Anyway, I mentioned more cases where there is no voluntarily agreement. > You also dont get jailed for speech but for
21.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
> that is not in good faith I did not say that. I am sure that CRConrad is acting in good faith. > but you are fine with Yes, I explained why I said it in the post that you are replying to. My biggest mistake was using sarcasm to conv
22.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
I think that this is extremely simplistic. For example it does not account for individualist anarchism or the collectivist "for our country/nation/race" pushed by various fascist governments.
23.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
This also seems to be bi-partisan sadly.
24.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
No need to be so hostile and toxic. I only mentioned it because this is an actual argument against TLS that I have seen being used in the past, even by popular sites such as pornhub for example (before being forced to enable TLS due to goog
25.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
I showed that this is incorrect here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28587930 > You go to jail because what you said is actually a crime to say Sounds like the US. Just look at all these people who went to jail for
26.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
Specifically for expressing beliefs? No. Only the one that I mentioned as a reply to the sibling post to yours.
27.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
> There is no free speech anywhere in Europe This is a bold and unsubstantiated claim. > And there is no doubt she would be free in every state in the US. For this specific action? Sure. For other actions that are protected under the
28.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
A lot of people? Sure. Everybody? Not really, some people are really vocal about how "data wants to be free".
29.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
One man's criminal is another man's freedom fighter. Snowden is a criminal but his supporters consider him a decent person. I do not believe that the two are mutually exclusive. The whole point of projects like freenet is to let p
30.
by h_anna_h 5y ago
> which got us Trump and the current antivax movement I think that you are stretching it a bit here. Claiming that individualism is responsible for that seems unsubstantiated.

More ›