Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
h0l0cube
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
18 ms
·
241.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
> I can't imagine I'll be sitting here in 2030 saying "batteries aren't there yet". Or if you're looking now at sodium ion. It's only just hitting the consumer market, but it's already cheap enoug
242.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
> I do not believe that battery capacity costs will decrease by 3-4 orders of magnitude “within the next few years,” Fair call for lithium chemistries, which will probably drop closer to one order of magnitude within 2-3 years (if the tr
243.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
I misspoke. They've been very quick to react to Ukranian intel. If they were staffed, perhaps they'd have the capability to be proactive, but I can't necessarily say they would be motivated to, esp. when the military is d
244.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
> “Growth” can be skewed if you only look at a person’s words and actions I guess my point is that his words and actions haven't been one sided. e.g., He assists Ukraine, but he also supports Trump who has implied he will withdraw
245.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
Democrats aren’t the liberal media, and the current Democratic controlled government also happen to be subsidizing both SpaceX and Tesla
246.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
Also, crucially, Starlink has been proactive in trying to disconnect Russian operatives who have managed to attain a Starlink connection. All the same, Elon’s backing of Trump doesn’t bode well for a good outcome for Ukraine (nor other ex-
247.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
I’m not unaware of his behavior since, but people are complicated, so is ‘growth’, and I try to resist the urge to see only one side of the equation.
248.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
> He likes to help people if he can come out as a hero, otherwise you’re a "pedo" I made reference to exactly this if you read carefully. I actually think this rejection is an inflection point in his behavior. He ought to have
249.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
I think intention matters here. It’s great for those people who are helped by Mr. Beast, but it’s coming from a place of ego and profit, not charity. Happy for those helped, but it’s still a little unseemly. However, I do think Musk genuine
250.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
Depends on the price of batteries, which are rapidly declining. Within the next few years the numbers will change in favor of batteries. Though it also depends on the load and having enough space/sunlight for the solar array
251.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
I’m not saying privacy doesn’t matter, I’m saying that there aren’t any enforced guardrails on this growth mechanism to protect it. It’s an illusion of choice. Government intervention is really needed here
252.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
I meant that it doesn’t matter if you deny because your friends will sell you out.
253.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
Even when you deny, enough of your contacts won’t that it doesn’t even matter
254.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
I agree. It's getting more and more pointless to avoid SoC. No need to do expensive bus transports when you can just stay on-die. The only upgradeability that's needed is to swap out entire SoCs.
255.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
> has hardly been running the show any more than a bear eating a salmon out of a river thus far Exactly. We're on an super-linear growth curve. Looking at the earth on a timescale since biological life emerged, it would seem that
256.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
> This race may even be the answer to the Fermi paradox The mostly unchallenged popular notion that fleshy human intelligence will still be running the show 100s – let alone 1000s – of years from now is very naive. We're nearing th
257.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
Be mindful of the forum you're on, and yourself.
258.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
> (or since M1) The bigger deal about the M-series performance and efficiency is SoC, not the ISA. This is something that could take off in the x86 world though it stifles upgradeability
259.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
> confronting to a consensus worldview There's a bit of missed irony here that you decrying the 'sour grapes' crowd with 'sour grapes' of your own, and yourself have been upvoted to the top. I do agree this cult
260.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
Thought this too. The example queries look very much like Ecto statements. I miss the ergonomics and flexibility of Ecto when I use database wrappers on other platforms.
261.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
> A canny torturer A canny torturer would read the Smart People on a public forum red-teaming cperciva's mind.
262.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
> originally Apple tried to sell their bland aluminum box as a fashion accessory--and it was only after multiple iterations that they found out health and fitness was the main appeal and focused on it. Wristwatch fitness trackers had alr
263.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
Yeah, that's why I qualified with 'could'. Really depends on what facilities the hardware and driver provide. If the GPU is on the same die, perhaps the latency isn't great, but I really don't have the data on tha
264.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
Specifically physics benefits from CPU processing. Efficient rendering pipelines are typically one-way (CPU -> GPU), whereas the results of physics calculations are depended on both by the game logic and rendering, and it's much si
265.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
> feeding the app store" or is it going to shareholder profits Sure. It's all just revenue growth. Sans some anti-competition regulation, it's the prerogative of a business to charge as much as the market will bear, as m
266.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
I never get this argument, but following its logic, is Apple and Microsoft being really charitable by not gatekeeping and taking a cut for every paid-for application installed on their respective desktop platforms? To answer my own questio
267.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
> This is the point that I was originally disputing :) I did suspect we were at odds with each other somehow! > requires breaking things up into smaller pieces (agile, or engineer mindset), and it's orthogonal to your goal vs pro
268.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
> So your rethoric seems misplaced: I am arguing none of the things you are implying. I was mostly seizing on this line: > this is probably how "goal-oriented" people can learn to achieve big things I made the inference here
269.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
I read this long ago, and it poses itself as dark knowledge. The triage of 'sociopath', 'clueless', and 'losers', even if it bears out this neatly in reality – it doesn't – isn't very actionable. I
270.
▲
by
h0l0cube
2y ago
There's a lot to unpack here. But firstly, "enjoying the process" and "enjoying the result" aren't really in binary opposition. If one weren't to 'enjoy the process' but only 'enjoy the re
More ›