3 ms·
I never get this argument, but following its logic, is Apple and Microsoft being really charitable by not gatekeeping and taking a cut for every paid-for applic
by h0l0cube 2y ago
I never get this argument, but following its logic, is Apple and Microsoft being really charitable by not gatekeeping and taking a cut for every paid-for application installed on their respective desktop platforms? To answer my own question, it just seems that the status quo has inertia. In the way that we don't pay for online news, social media, or search, similarly, we've just accepted a large chunk of our purchase is feeding the app store.
Also, from memory, Xbox/Sony consoles are loss leaders to recoup profits from store sales. I'm not sure if that holds for Google and Apple phones, but I'd be more okay with app store fees if it did.
- pbhjpbhj 2y agoIs the "large chunk of our purchase ... feeding the app store" or is it going to shareholder profits? Appstores seem super inefficient if they cost so much to feed (ie run/maintain).
- h0l0cube 2y ago> feeding the app store" or is it going to shareholder profits Sure. It's all just revenue growth. Sans some anti-competition regulation, it's the prerogative of a business to charge as much as the market will bear, as much as it can be sustained, by whatever legal means necessary.