gojomo

54 ms·

541.
by gojomo 4y ago
> In the lane directly in front of them, facing them, and honking? Yes! In SF and other big free-country cities at 4am, some human drivers are high! Sometimes human drivers are passed-out or suffering a health crisis. Sometimes they&#x27
542.
by gojomo 4y ago
> How would one go about finding that data? The autonomous car companies have a lot of the data, since they've run the same cars with drivers extensively. They can see the differences in rates-of-situations between cars-working-auto
543.
by gojomo 4y ago
There are not uncountably many – we live in a finite world governed by understandable physical and civic laws. There's an actually measurable rate of humans blocking other traffic, and for how long before resolution, and an actually
544.
by gojomo 4y ago
Given that often human-driven, or human-parked, cars create similar temporary obstacles, the most important question here is: does this happen more-often, or for longer-periods, with autonomous cars? I don't see the article, or quoted
545.
by gojomo 4y ago
I'm sorry to hear that. From a faraway stranger, I'd say: • Your written communication, in this comment, and via a quick look at other recent comments, appears excellent. Whatever your other comms/awkwardness concerns, writin
546.
by gojomo 4y ago
The downvoters/flaggers are mislabeling these observations as 'derogatory' when they are simply 'irreverent'. And, since the comment is irreverent in exactly same way that the subjects of the comment – publicity-see
547.
by gojomo 4y ago
In what way is the post you're responding to derogatory?
548.
by gojomo 4y ago
The way the Facebook Metaverse chops off avatars at the waste, it could've only been an intense/suggestive make-out session there.
549.
by gojomo 4y ago
Understanding how moderation powers for online services play out in real-life situations is absolutely an important topic for hackers. Especially so when it's the megaplatforms on which so many other projects depend. Similar motivation
550.
by gojomo 4y ago
“Please tell us about the time you most successfully hacked some (non-computer) system to your advantage.”
551.
by gojomo 4y ago
"Keeping the lights on" isn't enough: to be a good CEO, he needs to keep making progress, especially on shared goals of both old & possible-new ownership. One guess (albeit not one of high confidence) is that the outgoing
552.
by gojomo 4y ago
While that's really weird, I think you handled it properly in-the-moment. Sometimes there are difficult people, sometimes you're catching people at their very-worst due to hidden reasons. Unless there's an imminent worry abou
553.
by gojomo 4y ago
Pretty weak, tendentious study mainly designed to flatter the experimenter's priors. Doesn't compare "advantaged" group (here assumed to simply be "white (non-Hispanic)") to any others. Claims to find "mis
554.
by gojomo 4y ago
How does SXG "set dynamite to" http-server-centricity? Aren't all resources still named via HTTP endpoints, thus also bringing in overhead of the domain-system & TLS-Certificate assumptions? It seems to enable path-indiff
555.
by gojomo 4y ago
SXG is cool! But as far as I can tell, Chromium-only, and making HTTP exchanges the central artifact of a new Twitter-like communications-standard might bring in unwarranted overhead & assumptions. In particular, some weaknesses of Acti
556.
by gojomo 4y ago
It is possible that the same temporary (read-only?) access that would allow you to delete the tweet would also allow you to capture much of the relevant evidence: • fetching the offending tweet via a raw/API method could, in the JSON,
557.
by gojomo 4y ago
Then a 3rd-party app is the most-likely route-of-compromise, as it could explain a tweet without a password-compromise or password-change. If you regain even read-only access to your account, check/trim those first.
558.
by gojomo 4y ago
Remember, not long ago even @jack's account was taken over: https://www.wired.com/story/jack-dorsey-twitter-hacked/ If you'd ever supplied a phone number as a backup-auth, then a SIM/phone-number-hi
559.
by gojomo 5y ago
Eventually all these creeds will be vanquished, and the world will be united under Last Thursdayism. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Last_Thursdayism If you repent all other false beliefs & join now, you can be rebor
560.
by gojomo 5y ago
I'm quite comfortable with my 15+ year comment history, associated with my real name – especially as compared to a 55-day-old anon account that just expresses peeved attitude, above as here, instead of reasoning. But hey, thanks for at
561.
by gojomo 5y ago
It tells me it's still early. Many still think Bitcoin offers anonymity. It takes life experience to fully appreciate privacy, & there's tons of naive enthusiasm in crypto that will "grow up" into better, more-priva
562.
by gojomo 5y ago
Your claim was that it was possible to “track those coins”. Your insistence, wordiness, & goalpost-shifting can’t cover up that you’re trying to assertively bluff knowledge of things you don’t understand, like a child trying to pretend
563.
by gojomo 5y ago
Thanks for at least trying to explain! Of course you can always do a MadLibs-style search and replace on rhetoric. But are the resulting linguistic similarities relevant in the real world? Isn’t all the real impact on people - who aren’t me
564.
by gojomo 5y ago
Yes, but I do think it's valid to include such a qualifier to draw a distinction between people who apply a very mild "socialism" to enhance a welfare state – while leaving most traditional freedoms and private property intac
565.
by gojomo 5y ago
Before, I could think you were simply misinformed. But when you say "I have read plenty about them and it's still possible to track those coins through various means using various pieces of metadata", you're either lying
566.
by gojomo 5y ago
And thanks to you, for demonstrating your flimsy analogy can only be defended with attitude, not reasoning!
567.
by gojomo 5y ago
You should read more about Monero & especially Zcash, because their tech specifically overcomes this "pseudonymous" false-allegation in your 1st paragraph. If they in fact worked like Bitcoin, with balances & account-numbe
568.
by gojomo 5y ago
I love Python, but any definition of 'web3' broad enough to include the things GvR despises also includes many foundational things likely to outlive Python, with greater influence on human welfare, like: * cryptographically-anchor
569.
by gojomo 5y ago
Cryptoeconomics has been a mix of successes & failures, among the very-privileged who can afford to take financial risks, for just the last ~13y. Everyone involved knows there's a lot of things left to solve, but sees reasons for h
570.
by gojomo 5y ago
The time it takes to apply for these seed programs is days not months. Many (including a16z START & 500startups) don't limit applications to "a few times a year" nor "accept you only at certain times of the year&quot

More ›