Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gchadwick
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
Thinking about it the Apple II is a better example here, for one thing it's yet older (47 years). However I don't personally posses one nor have I ever used one so I concentrated on the C64. The author talks about doing timeless a
62.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
I find it odd the author spends lots of time talking about vintage typewriters but then fails to consider vintage computers which can give some real life examples of computers that are still usable almost 50 years on from their original rel
63.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
> After "bootle cap attached to the bottle" EU law Am I the only person who thinks this is just fine and indeed a good idea? Minor tweak to lid manufacturing that aids recycling and disposal and is useful as a user of the bottl
64.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
Does depend upon the project but I suspect this is far too low. Only thing you're likely to get in this price range is a small addition / tweak to an existing design. A very minimal design from scratch that uses existing off the s
65.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
Not OP but my partner lived in Copenhagen for two years. As with all of Scandinavia fluency in English is very common, practically universal in cities so you can happily live there without speaking a word of the local language. Also unlike
66.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
Is GPU rendering used today for VFX? From a quick google it seems that yes GPU based rendering is definitely an option, even if there's various reasons to still prefer CPU. So in your case was it really what you were aiming to do was p
67.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
Worth noting the story here has subtly that the headline cannot accurately capture. For one I wouldn't say this is about raising safety concerns or whistle-blowing, it's about how the employer views employees talking to the media.
68.
▲
CHERI Myths: I don't need CHERI if I have safe languages
(cheriot.org)
2 points
by
gchadwick
2y ago
|
0 comments
69.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
Improved hardware based abstractions to provide stronger security and better ways to isolate software components just seems like a good idea. Yes you can certainly do plenty in software (in particular using language like Rust) but presumabl
70.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
That's exactly what we're doing with OpenTitan: https://opentitan.org/ Which Google will be using in Chromebook for it's security chip https://lowrisc.org/news/nuvoton-develops-opentitan-
71.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
Would be interesting to know what verification they've done on this core. Given it's included as a bonus feature presumably they haven't done full DV on it. The repository has a testbench for running binaries, which includes
72.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
At a guess it's because the author has been using Yosys for some formal verification work and maybe for doing some synthesis trials and it doesn't support system verilog natively. Though things are improving there: https:/&#
73.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
This looks awesome a really great step up from the RP2040. I'm a big fan of the original and I'm excited to see all the improvements and upgrades. I imagine with the new secure boot functionality they've got a huge new range
74.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
Are Google really pushing it a 'proper' security feature? You've quoted a line at the end of a blog that doesn't elaborate further. In the android documentation for instance it stats '[MTE] helps detect use-after-fr
75.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
Does this actually have any real world implications? If you're using MTE you already know there's a simple attack that succeeds with 1/16th probability (or maybe greater if you reserve some tags for special purposes or have s
76.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
> It is an extremely weird situation, and a deeply bad look I never followed all the ins and outs but from having a quick look through the comments on https://github.com/platformio/platform-raspberrypi/pull/
77.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
The devil really is in the details here, a tweet further down the thread quotes the new terms of use: https://x.com/Stretchedwiener/status/1798390688830402802 > Solely for the purposes of operating or improving
78.
▲
Open Silcon design to be employed in Chromebooks with OpenTitan
(nuvoton.com)
1 points
by
gchadwick
2y ago
|
0 comments
79.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
Indeed but I still feel my original point stands. If you can achieve their process half reasonably with a bodged espresso machine there's a reasonable chance it will become popular (assuming of course it does provide unique coffee!). I
80.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
Until James Hoffman ( https://www.youtube.com/@jameshoffmann/videos ) has done a video on it, it may as well not exist ;) Interesting idea, always nice to see new ways to brew coffee. I wonder how easy it is to replicate
81.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
According to this: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/... yes. Note that the foundation has had a majority stake in RPi ltd (as a private company) for a long time this is not a new structu
82.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
This is already the setup, the foundation owns the trading company and it is the trading company going to IPO. From a quick scan it's not clear to me what share of ownership of RPi ltd the foundation would retain post IPO other than th
83.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
Ah yes I meant D1-3!
84.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
This is a good point though I'd argue that the spec isn't all that readable for some important things. For example the description of exception handling is sprinkled between the CSR definitions of the CSRs involved. There's n
85.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
> No document that I could find has ever tried to specify an instruction set independent of an actual implementation. What do you mean by this? I'd say most ISA specifications do this (e.g. the Arm spec doesn't refer to Arm
86.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
Another issue I take with the RISC-V spec is it relies on a common understanding of technical terms without actually defining them precisely anywhere. To take one example it never defines what an interrupt is and more broadly never defines
87.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
ISAs are complex things so you can't say one is technically superior to the other. I would say you're right though in that RISCV enjoys the success it's seeing due to the open specification and licensing model. People general
88.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
Getting the tools and skills to do PCB assembly and SMD rework seems like a no-brainer (indeed I'd say essential!) if you're aiming to do serious work with building hardware. Not something I've done myself but soldering an LG
89.
▲
by
gchadwick
2y ago
For an article extolling the benefits of embeddings for developers looking to dip their toe into the waters of AI it's odd they don't actually have an intro to embeddings or to vector databases. They just assume the reader already
90.
▲
by
gchadwick
3y ago
This looks like a nice piece of work but worth noting that as it uses a stock RP2040 Pico board any hardening against physical attacks will be done purely in software so cloning the HSM entirely or extracting keys may not be too complex for
More ›