Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
frgtpsswrdlame
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
To be clear, the parliamentarian is only an advisory role, they don't get to rule or decide anything, only offer guidance which senators then choose to listen to. But they could ignore it (and have done so in the past) or can fire the
32.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
You can't figure out how to describe a math problem correctly to ChatGPT without already knowing the solution.
33.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
I think he's off base. There are lots of places on the internet I could go to where the users are anonymous and the conversations are frequently about sacred subjects. In this sense they would be considered 'lively' but to me
34.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
Without defending their wording, I think the absolute best case for nationalizing a firm is one where the industry is based off of natural resources, vital to the public in the short term, and detrimental to the public in the long term.
35.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
I don't know, did Wolfram Alpha end homework problems for Calc 1? Not really, because it's useful practice for the test you will probably take. Pointless essays will be diminished but for stuff like AP English exams, where you hav
36.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
I mean certainly some of it is social contagion but what kicked off the contagion? I feel like in an article talking about why tech is laying people off surely interest rates should at least appear as a possible reason.
37.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
I don't think it's a success story when a chemical company is pressured to stop producing something because of it's health effects after that chemical has made it into the blood of nearly every individual on the planet.
38.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
Ah, that's what I get for just backing out and not scrolling to the bottom. At the same time though, ugh. I think this is probably where real world usecases of GPT are going but taking something a human expressed concisely and then usi
39.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
Was this written by a chatbot? The first few paragraphs are giving me major 'freshman padding for space' vibes.
40.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
So 4 counts on wire fraud and then also commodities fraud, securities fraud, money laundering and campaign finance laws. For the moment, if we set aside whether these will be proven, how bad does a stack of charges like this look for him if
41.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
I've seen this going around my circle and found it very interesting. What I don't have though is a very useful basis for comparison. I'm curious if anyone here knows of any previous attempts at alternatives to back propagatio
42.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
It's been coming out that he donated lots to them too so I guess we'll see. My impression overall though is that he will end up in jail, it's just going to take a while for everyone who received his money to come to terms wit
43.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
I don't think the way you've phrased it can possibly be true. I would assume whether you have ADHD or not an amphetamine is going to raise your heart rate.
44.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
I don't think it's an accident that a principal at a real estate firm thinks the way to get people back in the office is to give them a lot more square footage lol. But more seriously, I think if you really think being in the offi
45.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
Read this yesterday and absolutely loved it. Especially feel the pain regarding working with management. I think there's an accountability that comes with evaluating management decisions with data that nobody really wants. I still have
46.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
You don't 'regulate' a ponzi scheme (at least not in the sense that you mean regulation), you prosecute it.
47.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
Haha yes, my parents put a password to keep me from playing WoW on the family computer. When I used ophcrack to get the password they were mad (but I think a little impressed.)
48.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
Wow this looks perfect for what I need right now - just a bit of lightweight tracking.
49.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
I was just studying for a test where I had to do this. There's a bunch of articles out there on how to do it but for my money, this is the best calculation focused one: https://www.anotsorandomwalk.com/backpropagation-e
50.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
I'm think that's incorrect. >And not announcing this rule before the match starts. I don't think there's a possible way to more clearly announce a rule than declaring it in a parameter -> friendlyPassOk=true. >I
51.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
I don't know, I think it's probably the most interesting question you can ask. As these domain-specific superhuman AIs roll out, the most important thing to know is when/how you can take it out of distribution and beat it. Or
52.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
1. If it's too hard to come up with an objective benchmark for AGI then we should rethink what it is we're doing talking about progress toward that's goal. 2. You could also rework this list and say that an AI which can fulfi
53.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
It wouldn't even have to be a language model, just some sort of meta program that handled the switchboarding, as it were, between subsystems would be enough. But my real point is just more narrow, you can't measure progress to art
54.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
>Should land owners be obligated to lower the price to $0.25 so that this teenager can buy the property with a coin he finds on the street? Wouldn't a reality where land is only held by those using it and you can buy land for a quar
55.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
The already placed checkmarks are wrong. An AGI by this list would be able to beat humans at chess and win an art competition, both of which are already checked off. But the chess playing AI and the art competition AI are completely separat
56.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
>While I do agree that property needs maintenance, why would a landlord pay somebody to occupy their property? What's the incentive to own the property at all then? To live in or use? That seems like a way better situation!
57.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
Haha, the next layer will be a sweater for pedestrians that tricks computer vision systems into thinking you're a stop sign. Probably wouldn't be that hard even.
58.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
> Truly this is becoming a them-vs-us situation with management and board vs their own employees. It has always been a them-vs-us situation. It's just that 'them' (management/ownership) have been in a hugely advantage
59.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
Sidenote: how come when a police officer does something and gets fired for it, the headlines always state 'ex police officer?' The headline reads to me as if he was not a police officer at the time of the offense but the article r
60.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
One thing I think the article maybe misses. I love playing Civilization but when I play, I rarely win militarily, or in fact, at all. Instead I just build up and up and up until my winning feels like a foregone conclusion and then I quit an
More ›