>Should land owners be obligated to lower the price to $0.25 so that this teenager can buy the property with a coin he finds on the street? Wouldn't a reality

>Should land owners be obligated to lower the price to $0.25 so that this teenager can buy the property with a coin he finds on the street? Wouldn't a reality where land is only held by those using it and you can buy land for a quarter be better? I don't even mean to be funny or anything but that seems like a much better situation that our current one.