Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
frgtpsswrdlame
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
61.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
Just because 85% is environmental doesn't mean that there's hope for us all. It's a common mistake to think of genes as unable to be changed and environment to be changed. But, for example, maybe if your mother smokes during
62.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
>In IRV, wouldn't someone whose first choice was a Republican candidate almost definitely pick another Republican candidate as their second choice? Evidently not. Or at least many of them didn't in this case.
63.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
Yes, it would actually be so much simpler if the Fed was capable of acting on only one side of the equation but they necessarily touch both. See a completely plausible causal chain: Inflation up -> Rates up -> Housing purchases down -
64.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
Maybe the problem is trying to understand this in terms of confidence and not in terms of accuracy. In fact, we might say that some are underconfident, some are overconfident but almost all are inaccurate in predicting the form and/or
65.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
Basically they're doing a utilitarian calculus. But since our calculus is basically all pretend, we can assign arbitrary importance to anything we want just by daydreaming the costs and percentages of these super unlikely, super catast
66.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
I think there's a conflict here though: >If what you're doing isn't likely to be censored by authorities then you're being incredibly wasteful by using blockchain If the wasteful people doing non-crime activities on t
67.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
United States Semiconductor - aka spinning up a nationalized firm.
68.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
You make it sound like they're printing Lenin or something lol, they're a little left but certainly not 'very.' Furthermore, why wouldn't a topic like private members' clubs be fair game for any sort of major j
69.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
Did you read it? They explicitly do talk about Quantitative Easing following 2008...
70.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
Are excess reserves related to these large amounts in overnight repos I keep hearing about? If so, how do you pull that money out of the system so it returns to being responsive.
71.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
There's more than just monetary policy and war. Monetary policy would imply demand for gas is up, driving prices up. But demand for gas is still lower now than it was pre-covid. Oil is on its way out the door. Oil companies all have pr
72.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
Why wouldn't you focus on both? What's needed are solutions, in the search for them you should be willing to look anywhere that could yield one.
73.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
If inflation is occurring in Oil & Gas because of the crisis in Ukraine and inflation is occurring in eggs and beef because of monopolistic price gouging, then what is the point of lowering government spending? End the crisis in Ukraine
74.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
As someone who doesn't own a home but would like to in the future, reading this kind of stuff is making me sick.
75.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
>I agree that it is unacceptable to have eighth grade Algebra I classes and gifted education programs that disproportionately exclude Black and brown children. But if equity is the goal, we should be mandating that every eighth grader ta
76.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
>The people behind Tether sell tethers for $1 This is the problem. I don't believe all the tethers were sold in exchange for $1. If Tether wasn't receiving $1 for every tether then everything else falls apart.
77.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
You know we had 2008 and we learned that in high finance there were these complex derivatives that a lot of people understood in a loose sense, but rarely in a detailed sense. And that they were basing those complex instruments on credit ra
78.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
Even if you think the main reason crypto is bad is the environmental damage I think it's probably more convincing to normal people to talk about how stupid it is ala these fees than to talk about the environmental damage.
79.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
Feels a lot like 'Real free markets have never been tried!' which we all know from its standard form on the left. If, at this point in history, real free markets have been unable to sustain themselves in the areas of the economy t
80.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
4y ago
I doubt Marx could have thought of something more capitalist than $THC or $HCA.
81.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
5y ago
You're trying to do math in a scenario where you have no real numbers. Of course you can pull some stuff out of your butt (+10%, 1 year) to say it's going to save lives but unless you can justify those numbers it's meaningles
82.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
5y ago
Casualties per miles driven is a terrible stat for current self-driving technology because as it stands, it forces drivers to take over in the most dangerous situations. And you can't generalize for all miles in cars capable of self-dr
83.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
5y ago
>I read somewhere pay transparency just lowers the amount of pay for disagreeable people who try to earn more. It makes things cheaper for businesses in general because it's harder to get a rise. Then wouldn't you see businesse
84.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
5y ago
>But maybe in the days of phrenology, people thought a hooked nose had a plausible connection to personality as well? Phrenology is bumps on the head right? I think hook nose would be physiognomy. But yes, the idea was that your behavior
85.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
5y ago
Can you expand on this point? >It's very, very expensive, and their purchasing model seems designed to prevent people from realising this. How is it expensive in a way that's not transparent?
86.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
5y ago
>Surely this makes a difference in the lives of these people but on large scales, how much of a difference have you actually made? Judging by the article, quite a large difference. >there must be better solutions than solidifying the
87.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
5y ago
But I didn't say all stealing was okay, I said some stealing definitely is okay. I still think that's true. Some things in life are more important than property.
88.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
5y ago
Stealing is okay in all sorts of situations. Many things in life are more important than the rule of property.
89.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
5y ago
>and serious work is being done to get it right Like what?
90.
▲
by
frgtpsswrdlame
5y ago
>“Whether a [Level 2] automated driving system is engaged or not, every available vehicle requires the human driver to be in control at all times, and all state laws hold the human driver responsible for the operation of their vehicles,”
More ›