filipponeri

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by filipponeri 2y ago

   Thanks a lot for the useful comments and for starting this thread. It would be helpful when one is talking about a job to add the salary range. It makes a huge difference speculating about the success or un-success of getting a job in the 3
2. 2.▲
   Has the code used to discover Halicin been made public?

   1 points by filipponeri 3y ago|0 comments
3. 3.▲
   Peer Reviewing in Experimental Studies: A False Narrative Damaging Research(papers.ssrn.com)

   1 points by filipponeri 3y ago|1 comments
4. 4.▲
   by filipponeri 3y ago

   Peer Reviewing, the mechanism at the base of scientific publications, is actually a lie, a false narrative for the majority of published experimental studies. Behind such false narrative, that damages empirical research in many fields, hide
5. 5.▲
   by filipponeri 5y ago

   I thank jjgreen for her/his invaluable comment: > "What I didn't do was kvetch about it on a public forum." Academics are supposed to stay silent about the diffuse unfair peer reviewing, or else...
6. 6.▲
   Academic publishing is broken – unexpectedreview.net wants to fix it(unexpectedreview.net)

   2 points by filipponeri 5y ago|4 comments
7. 7.▲
   by filipponeri 5y ago

   did you ever received a review that you deemed unfair, unjustified, or inexplicable from some peer reviewed academic journal? Did that make you question the way peer reviewing is conducted? Unexpected Review is a community for researchers
8. 8.▲
   Unexpectedreview.net for discussing the unfair rejection of your paper(filipponeri.medium.com)

   1 points by filipponeri 6y ago|0 comments