2 ms·
I thank jjgreen for her/his invaluable comment: > "What I didn't do was kvetch about it on a public forum." Academics are supposed to stay silent about the di
by filipponeri 5y ago
I thank jjgreen for her/his invaluable comment:
> "What I didn't do was kvetch about it on a public forum."
Academics are supposed to stay silent about the diffuse unfair peer reviewing, or else...
- jjgreen 5y agoThat was an ill-mannered comment of mine, I apologise. Writing an academic paper is hard, it takes months of work, you send it off and it gets rejected, that crushes the soul. I've had that happen to me plenty of times. Is it fair? it does not matter, you can complain all you like about it, it will not make any difference, no-one in the history of the world has ever had a paper accepted after complaining that it's not fair. Sorry, that just the way it is. Put the paper and review in a drawer, leave it for 3 months, then look at them again when you're not so cross. Read the reviews, see if you can find anything in them which might be justified (particularly if multiple reviewers say the same thing), address those, then send it off to different journal. Do that 2-3 times, then give it up, move onto something else.