fedeb95

42 ms·

1. 541.▲
   by fedeb95 4y ago

   I'll start putting 1€ for every article that assumes US=world. I bet I'll be rich soon.
2. 542.▲
   by fedeb95 4y ago

   From my point of view it's inevitable new content is made. If you make content, you just can't stay quiet: how that catches on is another matter. I agree that too much content is made: the reason is mostly money and lack of educat
3. 543.▲
   by fedeb95 4y ago

   That's true, however if the majority of movies are like that, most people will watch them, shifting movie culture toward this kind of movies. Sure, niches could form, but given a movie requires a lot of money, that's really hard.
4. 544.▲
   by fedeb95 4y ago

   I enjoyed the article and I think there should be more thought on gnoseology (that's what the post is about). The problem is: you don't know what weird means. You could think of it as something outside what the majority thinks, bu
5. 545.▲
   by fedeb95 4y ago

   A lack of proper funding of well made things doesn't mean it won't be achieved ever. Many assumptions made in this post... makes it quite useless
6. 546.▲
   by fedeb95 4y ago

   Movies have become something absurd. It's wasted effort in my opinion. All this money doesn't lead to an improvement artistically. Some movies are just trash piles made for advertising products
7. 547.▲
   by fedeb95 4y ago

   DDG is so much better for technical searches related to programming
8. 548.▲
   Probability of Luck(scriptkid.it)

   1 points by fedeb95 4y ago|0 comments
9. 549.▲
   by fedeb95 4y ago

   While I generally agree, technical debt is not waste, is debt. You borrow time by giving away quality. You pay that time with interests. If the loan is useful, that is, allows you to meet an otherwise impossible deadline, go for it. Maybe t
10. 550.▲
    by fedeb95 4y ago

    I've used it with my team for a couple of years and I don't really dislike it as long as people don't take it very seriously. It is mainly a tool to reason about what needs to be done. It's interesting when someone gives
11. 551.▲
    by fedeb95 4y ago

    Ahaha well for what it's worth I'd sacrifice yours
12. 552.▲
    by fedeb95 4y ago

    Now you all be honest and admit the one that took you longer to solve was the one with the life savings
13. 553.▲
    by fedeb95 4y ago

    it got my interest, but not all the world can get the Silicon Valleys references you make. Maybe it's better to keep it on the technical side
14. 554.▲
    by fedeb95 4y ago

    The insights could be valuable if they were introduced as an opinion rather than facts validated by a quick poll online
15. 555.▲
    by fedeb95 4y ago

    I'm interested in how this turns out. It's probably one of those things you can't see much applications right now but can sprout many things you didn't see coming. That said, do we really need that common knowledge progr
16. 556.▲
    by fedeb95 4y ago

    I like this kind of discussions and as members of society it's hard to reason on things that are widely accepted. If one shares his point of view but doesn't want to give up his personal computer, one way may be to buy an used com
17. 557.▲
    by fedeb95 4y ago

    I think I got the author point and agreeing with those premises I could even share the conclusion. However it seems to me that the argument only works in concluding something about existing consciousnesses, it doesn't say anything abou
18. 558.▲
    by fedeb95 4y ago

    I agree with you. Let me clarify: in your example we can see three possible branches. 1) nobody does anything, we all gain 0. 2) we profit from the bums, the bums gain 1 and we gain 100. 3) we actually do something for the bums, here the pa
19. 559.▲
    by fedeb95 4y ago

    I somewhat share this view, which I now learn is called Copenhagen Interpretation of Ethics (don't know if by the author or academically). Let me clarify my differences: interacting with a problem should be worded like "creating t
20. 560.▲
    by fedeb95 4y ago

    Thanks! Didn't know that
21. 561.▲
    Ask HN: Why the EU did a law only for phone chargers and not, say, laptops?

    1 points by fedeb95 4y ago|4 comments
22. 562.▲
    by fedeb95 4y ago

    Thanks, I will check them out. What I like of HN is how upvotes drive news up and discussion. Also the community being small, content quality is very high
23. 563.▲
    by fedeb95 4y ago

    This is gold. I wish they explained polynomials like this to me in school. Italian school system sucks
24. 564.▲
    Ask HN: Is there a news feed like HN but less computer science/science focused?

    3 points by fedeb95 4y ago|2 comments
25. 565.▲
    Hurst exponent in crypto (4 years later)(noblogo.org)

    2 points by fedeb95 4y ago|0 comments
26. 566.▲
    by fedeb95 4y ago

    I share your point on help across all the spectrum of abilities, and I don't think there aren't differences in intelligence. I just question this way of measuring it and that measurement is useful. The IQ test models results with
27. 567.▲
    by fedeb95 4y ago

    I always had a problem getting the point of IQ tests. It necessarily makes assumptions on what intelligence is, seems a bit self referencing. It measures how you conform to what a specific group of people think intelligence is... So I can&#
28. 568.▲
    by fedeb95 4y ago

    the pointer is annoying though
29. 569.▲
    by fedeb95 4y ago

    the study is interesting, but it's wrong to infer causation. you don't have data about what people thought back in the 70s, so it may as well be that economy got shaped in order to reflect what people were already thinking in term
30. 570.▲
    by fedeb95 4y ago

    I've used it successfully for my ends in a personal project of mine. Together with wireshark it's good for learning in my experience