I enjoyed the article and I think there should be more thought on gnoseology (that's what the post is about). The problem is: you don't know what weird means. Y

I enjoyed the article and I think there should be more thought on gnoseology (that's what the post is about). The problem is: you don't know what weird means. You could think of it as something outside what the majority thinks, but then you have a biased idea of what the majority thinks. It's way harder then what is presented here