eonil

8 ms·

61.
by eonil 13y ago
You talk like an arm dealer. "The restriction only increases cost to get forbidden stuffs, and they will eventually take it. Sum's zero, so nothing beneficial."
62.
by eonil 13y ago
And then, this article is hooking me with title…
63.
by eonil 13y ago
It would be better to define HTTPS by default, and plain HTTP for exceptional cases. I would use HTTP only for strictly public and eternally cacheable big files.
64.
by eonil 13y ago
AFAIK, Dart can run on bare JS without any extra support.
65.
by eonil 13y ago
OK I see.
66.
by eonil 13y ago
It is insulting to Cocoa to compare it to .NET. .NET framework lacks concept of immutable container and abuses subclassing. That's enough to degrade itself.
67.
by eonil 13y ago
For development cost, there's no clue for it's easier(=cheaper). It's just your opinion, and common sense is Android costs more. I think you need to provide some clue or logic to claim something isn't a common sense. Or
68.
by eonil 13y ago
I apologize for omitting etc. .
69.
by eonil 13y ago
I love reason-less down-vote.
70.
by eonil 13y ago
I doubt you're actually understanding the concept of cost … Or are you claiming that Android developers are a lot cheaper than iOS developers? About less than half? If so, that's fair claim… Review 12 months later? Seriously, are
71.
by eonil 13y ago
I am 98% sure that her company is using some hybrid solution rather than SDK. Otherwise, there's no situation which make sense. 2% exclusion for her mention for justice . If she has some her own belief on justice…
72.
by eonil 13y ago
In context of majority … going Android first is sane only in these cases. (1) You are willing to take far higher initial development/maintenance cost (for sanely working app) just to reach people with far less buying power. (2) You ne
73.
by eonil 13y ago
Also, paid less than backend. Companies encourage people to become a front-end dev because they don't want to do it.
74.
by eonil 13y ago
COM… Ahhhhhh…
75.
by eonil 13y ago
"But, uh-oh, strings are immutable, so each of these append operations causes the entire multi-megabyte string to be copied." This is only true when the scope is limited to specific languages… I am pretty sure that the author is t
76.
by eonil 13y ago
Maybe this also can explain why MS want to go back to C++ with abandoning 10 years old .NET strategy.
77.
by eonil 13y ago
Implementation's good, but the concept and idea is completely useless at least for Objective-C/Cocoa. All the symbol names of the Cocoa are strictly designed to be used with auto-completing IDE support, not bare editor. That&#x2
78.
by eonil 13y ago
Cyberdyne?
79.
by eonil 13y ago
I couldn't even imagine something like ref-qualifier and function as template parameter.
80.
by eonil 13y ago
How Elixir offer type check - compile time parameter validity check on each specialized types - or similar feature? Is this type inferencing language?
81.
by eonil 13y ago
> In ArangoDB, a transaction is always a server-side operation, and is executed on the server in one go, without any client interaction. It doesn't seem to support interactive transaction. That means only simple batch read & wri
82.
by eonil 13y ago
The biggest surprise to me is it requires Adobe Flash.
83.
by eonil 13y ago
I don't think corporates have regular refresh cycle. They don't spend money if they don't have to.
84.
by eonil 13y ago
Agreed
85.
by eonil 13y ago
From the developer's perspective, this is just a shit. Now you have to deal with something like DLL hell in API versions instead of a few of fixed major versions.
86.
by eonil 13y ago
That fragmentation forces developers to be remained painful and, sucky old API and toolset. What really sucks is Google only advances to newer version, and don't give a shit on old versions - that's what they have been do on their
87.
by eonil 13y ago
Wow. Bring some number which proves they're not (mostly) nobody . Then I will apology for ignorance.
88.
by eonil 13y ago
It seems like making profit by jailbreaking. Apple lawyers would like this.
89.
by eonil 13y ago
Agreed. Google is an ad company who want to look like a high-tech company. Maybe they can be changed later, but not now. Sometimes they want to sell some techs, but (mostly) nobody wants to pay for their techs except marketers.
90.
by eonil 13y ago
Though I am not sure that I understood your intention… I think Google will eventually kill Android from Android+Chrome stack. Just like MS did on DOS for Windows. Chrome on Android is just a temporal form, and there's no reason not to

More ›