enriquec

9 ms·

61.
by enriquec 3y ago
What an awful sample to draw an absurd conclusion
62.
by enriquec 3y ago
everyone looking for any reason when its obviously a massive recession due to govt. spending
63.
by enriquec 3y ago
Ironically, forcing Apple to implement features to enable third parties is quite literally forced speech.
64.
by enriquec 3y ago
Very true. I find it hard to argue against something like generics - since they increase access and lower price.
65.
by enriquec 3y ago
so if you get in an accident in this.. you get completely crushed right?
66.
by enriquec 3y ago
as a cyclist, no, they can't.
67.
by enriquec 3y ago
Nothing about this would succeed. Do only monopolies perform mergers?
68.
by enriquec 3y ago
False. Blatant fourth amendment violations were absolutely proven.
69.
by enriquec 3y ago
There is precedent of just responding that you can't discuss that. Not committing perjury. Its plain as day and you are stretching remarkably far to excuse blatantly illegal and immoral behavior.
70.
by enriquec 3y ago
blatant violations of the Fourth Amendment amongst other things. You are being purposefully obtuse. Really sad I wasted my time on you but at least other people can see that there is no depth, honesty, or consistency to the perspective you&
71.
by enriquec 3y ago
So where are the arrests and subpoenas for the crimes he exposed? Certainly, if the courts are as unbiased as you claim, that would have happened at some point in the last 10 years... right?
72.
by enriquec 3y ago
SO you just simply don't believe that kangaroo courts exist... how naive. What do you think of mandatory minimums, documented and proven IRS targeting, gitmo/wmds in Iraq, the prosecution of Aaron Swartz, or the fact that not a si
73.
by enriquec 3y ago
did the criminals he exposed face trial - or are they the ones that would run his trial?
74.
by enriquec 3y ago
lmfao so you don't believe in kangaroo courts? What's your opinion on how the government treated/surveilled MLK or how the UK castrated Alan Turing? The level of willful ignorance of history is truly appalling.
75.
by enriquec 3y ago
what part of the economy is doing fine?
76.
by enriquec 3y ago
I think the point is wrong and hilariously melodramatic.
77.
by enriquec 4y ago
have you ever heard a leftist not say that the problem is that they weren't far left enough?
78.
by enriquec 4y ago
You've never heard anyone say the main - and very popular - counter argument? (which is correct IMO) Seems disingenuous.
79.
by enriquec 4y ago
"incentives matter" - you're missing Econ 101
80.
by enriquec 4y ago
Its understood that those regulations wouldn’t have saved the train in Palestine. That’s one problem with the discourse on the left. I don’t favor regulation for the sake of regulation - nor cutting it for its own sake. There obviously need
81.
by enriquec 4y ago
"incapable of even a modicum of good governance"? really? You can't point to a single way in which these local communities govern better than the State of California? Thats laughable - at best.
82.
by enriquec 4y ago
I disagree. This says what is actually being done - while that title uses a biased and meaningless marketing term.
83.
by enriquec 4y ago
so... the grants were unnecessary? Also, how can someone see this catastrophe and still want to go with trains -- 200+ year old tech that is clearly environmentally destructive, doesn't solve last-mile, and can't be parallelized o
84.
by enriquec 4y ago
Is it weird at all given the market, inflation, and debt?
85.
by enriquec 4y ago
Presumably answered when they were hired to the board?
86.
by enriquec 4y ago
> Except that the regulation doesn't do any such thing (the USB-C mandate will expire automatically after a few years) The precedence has been set. > and the innovation angle is just bloviating from people who haven't read t
87.
by enriquec 4y ago
"hooverd not hearing anyone complaining" isn't an accurate measure of innovation lost through politicizing technology and mandating connectors
88.
by enriquec 4y ago
hacker news was overrun with non-technical people (with no real engineering or economics knowledge) long ago (like 6+ years). hardly any interesting discussion or deep understanding here anymore
89.
by enriquec 4y ago
whos going to invest knowing their investment could be completely wasted on the whims of beaurocrats and on their schedule?
90.
by enriquec 4y ago
you may not buy the "but muh innovation" - its also sad that that passes for discourse for you - but it is economic fact. whats your opinion on "muh regulatory capture"? what about lightning vs microusb?

More ›