3 ms·
so... the grants were unnecessary? Also, how can someone see this catastrophe and still want to go with trains -- 200+ year old tech that is clearly environment
by enriquec 4y ago
so... the grants were unnecessary? Also, how can someone see this catastrophe and still want to go with trains -- 200+ year old tech that is clearly environmentally destructive, doesn't solve last-mile, and can't be parallelized or re-routed, or even rescheduled easily
- manuelabeledo 4y ago> Also, how can someone see this catastrophe and still want to go with trains Perhaps because most of the industrialised world run tens of thousands of freight and passenger trains every day. What happened in Ohio is not an inherent issue with trains.
- dieortin 4y agoIt’s not more environmentally destructive than any of the alternatives, quite the opposite actually. And it’s the most efficient way to transport cargo and passengers across land.