dontlikeyoueith

5 ms·

31.
by dontlikeyoueith 10mo ago
> And realistically in a year, there won't be any people who can keep up. I've heard the same claim every year since GPT-3. It's still just as irrational as it was then.
32.
by dontlikeyoueith 11mo ago
I bet you believe in wizards and magic fairy dust too.
33.
by dontlikeyoueith 11mo ago
It rubs the data on its skin or else it gets the prompt again!
34.
by dontlikeyoueith 11mo ago
> Let's actually be generous and assume that all parties involved did the math and some due diligence and are not just idiots Economic history strongly suggests this would be a bad assumption.
35.
by dontlikeyoueith 11mo ago
> I don't see a fundamental barrier to it Neither did the people expecting fusion power and flying cars to come quickly. We have just as much evidence that fusion power is possible as we do that human level intelligence is possible.
36.
by dontlikeyoueith 11mo ago
> Still the fact that LLMs can do well in things like the maths olympiad have me thinking there must be some way to tweak this to be more brain like That's because you, as you admit in the next sentence, have almost no understanding
37.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
> That aside: I still think complaining about "hallucination" is a pretty big "tell". And I think that sentence is a pretty big tell, so ...
38.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
> if people like Musk or Bezos suddenly popped out of existence; their lives simply don't impact mine. If anything, their existence serves as an inspiration for others to try for big dreams. Many of those will fail, some will succe
39.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
Depends on your problem space too. Calendar app for local social clubs? Ship it and fix it later. B2B payments software that triggers funds transfers? JFC I hope you PIP people for that.
40.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
You're misunderstanding. I'm not saying Betelgeuse would be a type Ia. Betelgeuse will be a Type II supernova. I'm wondering whether Type II supernovae with smaller partners later become Type Ia once the larger partner explo
41.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
Are you trying to spin 80% yoy churn as good? Did you get your MBA from the back of a mail order catalog?
42.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
Wouldn't all Type Ia supernova be examples of at least one possible end state of such an event? https://science.nasa.gov/resource/type-ia-supernova/ The larger star explodes first in a Type II supernova, beco
43.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
Because readers at the time didn't struggle with it as they do now.
44.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
> Thus it is a local maximum, so any small change produces a worse result I have ML engineer brain, so to me any small change from a local maximum is an IMPROVEMENT (because we try to minimize loss functions). Your reading makes more se
45.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
Because it's newer and trendy and that's important for programmers learning their first tool that solves an old problem. Whether it should be important is another question, but it's a simple fact that it is.
46.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
> generally consider tailwind to be a minimal local maximum I feel like I've been nerd sniped trying to figure out what you mean by this.
47.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
> Dickens' sentence structure was just as difficult to parse then as it is now This is nonsense. Dickens was an enormously popular writer with common readers.
48.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
> I just wanted to say LLMs with MCP are definitely good enough for almost every use case you can come up with as long as you can provide them with high quality context. This just shows you lack imagination. I have a lot of use cases tha
49.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
Which federal law exactly requires states to spend money to enforce federal law? I'll give you a hint: none.
50.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
> You have to focus on the actual products and services which you provide and do a good job at it, not chase after any and every person with an opinion. That's a nice straw man you have there.
51.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
> Courts don’t make decisions on whether executive rules are told or bad, serve consumers or not This is just an obvious lie. They're not supposed to, but they obviously do. Usually against common citizens' interest.
52.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
> If they're not customers it doesn't matter at all what they think That kind of thinking is how you never get new customers and eventually fail as a business.
53.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
> Current job "permits" Claude usage, but does not pay for it. That seems like the worst of all worlds from their perspective. By not paying for it they introduce a massive security concern.
54.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
And if the parents are on valid non-resident visas? Suddenly the child has no status? Moreover, there is literally no mechanism to prove that your parents are citizens. Millions of citizens will be at the whim of whatever racist thug decid
55.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
> Maybe a good case, that i've used a lot, is using "spreadsheet inputs" and teaching the LLM to produce test cases/code based on the spreadsheet data (that I received from elsewhere) This seems weird to me instead of
56.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
> in particular the yappy one who was publicly inflammatory on Christmas Day. Well that's not a short list at X.
57.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
This is just dishonest marketing then.
58.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
This is magical thinking. Please stop.
59.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
Yes, it's still correct. Using the wrong words for things doesn't make them magical machine gods.
60.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
> Can you imagine paying for every command you run in your terminal? Yes, because hardware and electricity aren't free. I literally DO pay for every command. I just don't get an itemized bill so there's no transparency ab

More ›