dontlikeyoueith

6 ms·

61.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
And now we've come full circle back to UML-based code generation. Everything old is new again!
62.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
>I’m always hesitant to listen to the line coders on projects because they’re getting a heavy dose of the internal hype every day. I'm senior enough that I get to frequently see the gap between what my dev team thinks of our work an
63.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
> I really dislike all of this “reading between the lines” aren’t Americans supposed to be direct? Only when talking to people beneath them. When talking to your superiors, you should be deferential and circumspect. American society is
64.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
It's quite possible tariffs will make us all rich too. Why post something this useless?
65.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
If I wanted to be an EM, I'd apply for that job.
66.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
This is such a confusion of ideas that I don't even know how to respond any more. Good luck.
67.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
:facepalm: I ... did you respond to the wrong comment? Or do you actually think the DB table can genuinely reason about things?
68.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
A sufficiently large lookup table in DB is mathematically indistinguishable from a sufficiently complicated next token prediction algorithm is mathematically indistinguishable from general intelligence. All that means is that treating somet
69.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
> Anthropic's own research showed that Claude does actually "plan ahead", beyond the next token. For a very vacuous sense of "plan ahead", sure. By that logic, a basic Markov-chain with beam search plans ahead to
70.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
VS Code is pretty much the only exception to their overall quality level. One exception in 50 years does not inspire confidence.
71.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
> Microsoft will likely replicate Windsurf and Cursor's features within a year. Probably. > And deliver them with far greater stability and polish That seems ... overly optimistic given MS's history.
72.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
Wait until you learn about non-blocking IO. And threads. It's a whole new world out there.
73.
by dontlikeyoueith 1y ago
> the minerals in batteries don’t disappear after use. For all practical purposes they might, depending on how the batteries are disposed of.
74.
by dontlikeyoueith 2y ago
> Even for the US I don't believe the law system is that crappy. Then you're living in a fantasy world.
75.
by dontlikeyoueith 2y ago
Zero Dawn future confirmed.
76.
by dontlikeyoueith 2y ago
You aren't clever for re-inventing autarky. It's a bad idea for the same reason.
77.
by dontlikeyoueith 2y ago
This comment is such a confusion of ideas its comical.
78.
by dontlikeyoueith 2y ago
Oh look, a Trump advisor who understands nothing.
79.
by dontlikeyoueith 2y ago
No, for the same reason I don't try to manufacture my own car in my backyard or build my own house, or grow all of my own food, or ... This is basic fucking common sense: I'm good at some things and other people are good at other
80.
by dontlikeyoueith 2y ago
Certainly every chef-run fine dining restaurant would agree with that.
81.
by dontlikeyoueith 2y ago
It's nothing like that, but you're entitled to be confused and wrong.
82.
by dontlikeyoueith 2y ago
Most of them don't value hard science either.
83.
by dontlikeyoueith 2y ago
That's because the attention mechanism was designed for Seq2Seq models (i.e. translation in its most general form). Any other use of it is a case of "I have a hammer, so that's a nail".
84.
by dontlikeyoueith 2y ago
> Well first Zojirushi is unnecessarily expensive and difficult to clean Expensive sure, but it's only difficult to clean if you're a double amputee.
85.
by dontlikeyoueith 2y ago
They're probably doing RAG on a huge chunk of the internet, i.e. they built their own task-specific search engine.
86.
by dontlikeyoueith 2y ago
Why would you do this and not use Textract?
87.
by dontlikeyoueith 2y ago
AWS Textract works pretty well for this and is much cheaper than running LLMs.
88.
by dontlikeyoueith 2y ago
In improving the lives of their people? Yes, absolutely.
89.
by dontlikeyoueith 2y ago
It's particularly bad in the anglosphere because we have common law legal systems that are built around resolving personal disputes in court. This has upsides -- it was a good solution to the problem in the 1200s of people solving disp
90.
by dontlikeyoueith 2y ago
The problem is that people already have piss-poor reading comprehension. Relying LLMs to help them is going to make it worse than it already is.

More ›