dolni

50 ms·

481.
by dolni 6y ago
What point are you trying to make by misquoting me? Are you trying to compare public school to prison?
482.
by dolni 6y ago
> There's a massive gulf between revenge killing and boys fidgeting. I mean... no shit? The point wasn't to compare revenge killing to fidgeting. The point was to illustrate that impulse control is necessary for a civilized soc
483.
by dolni 6y ago
Couldn't disagree more. Humanity has developed a society with acceptable norms to make life more enjoyable for everybody. One of the important things school does is socialize kids. If a stranger breaks into your home and kills your kid
484.
by dolni 6y ago
More important than that is the result of the Grievance Studies affair. When there is such heavily biased review of social science papers, it calls the legitimacy of all of them into question.
485.
by dolni 6y ago
This seems like a good way to lose exceptional talent and be stuck with a bunch of mediocre or bad employees who will stick around as an easy way to get a raise. Any self-respecting high-output employee is going to be offended at the fact t
486.
by dolni 6y ago
How much concern is there on your team that Apple will make breaking changes to internals that you rely on? I've seen that happen multiple times in the past to JAMF, seemingly without any heads up.
487.
by dolni 6y ago
It's one thing to say that it's a chicken and egg problem for existing businesses that make money in the Apple ecosystem. It's another thing when you are still seeing new development efforts. It's 2020, this shit has bee
488.
by dolni 6y ago
Seems like the type of thing that would change pretty quickly if developers demanded an experience that wasn't complete trash. How quickly would Apple fold if all of a sudden there weren't third party applications for their device
489.
by dolni 6y ago
For as many incidents as Bitbucket has had this year, I am not inclined to think Atlassian has come up with something revolutionary.
490.
by dolni 6y ago
This isn't an answer to your question, and I apologize for that. But I have a tangential question of my own: what is the motivation driving the creation of "no code" tools? I don't mean simple graphical editors for workf
491.
by dolni 6y ago
I haven't observed this yet. At least in the comment sections I've participated in so far, there has been a healthy amount of disagreement. And it nearly always stays civil.
492.
by dolni 6y ago
+1. It's actually very disturbing to me just how much of an echo chamber it has become. Not only are slightly conservative ideas met with vitriol -- even the most ass-backwards, ridiculous ideas are showered in praise if they tow the l
493.
by dolni 6y ago
I've always been impressed with peoples' ability to create these neat projects within exceptional constraints. I've never attempted something like this myself, but I'd like to. My questions: How long does it generally ta
494.
by dolni 6y ago
> I don’t think you’re making any point here about confusion you’re just ranting. How uncharitable. > If I were to try and extract some coherent positive thought out of this, I’d say a website that tracks and allows discussion of ingr
495.
by dolni 6y ago
If your argument is that people need simple rules to follow, that list is way too complicated. You only need one: "eat a variety of vegetables".
496.
by dolni 6y ago
There are some good rules of thumb here, but this: > 2. Don’t eat anything with more than five ingredients, or ingredients you can't pronounce. This just smacks of so much ignorance as to be disgraceful. Something isn't good fo
497.
by dolni 6y ago
Which is part of why, in a below, I mentioned how egregious it was to oversimplify foods to "processed" or not. There needs to be more information disseminated about what kind of convenient foods people _can_ choose and what the i
498.
by dolni 6y ago
I don't know what public schools are teaching these days, but when I was a kid it was all about the food pyramid, which I discovered some years later in high school was absolute crap. You could go a long way with "eat a diverse di
499.
by dolni 6y ago
Yes, I read the definition. It does little to clear up confusion. What constitutes a synthetic flavor? Is vanilla extract an example or do you have to go further than that? Emulsifiers are things that actually get used in regular cooking. A
500.
by dolni 6y ago
People throwing out "processed food" as some catch-all term for packaged stuff that is bad for you is a major pet peeve of mine. Yes, foods that are pre-packaged tend not to be good for you. You _should_ eat fresh foods and vegeta
501.
by dolni 6y ago
> But then you need to make up a deployment system with rollbacks and all the other stuff k8s gives you. This is borderline trivial. If you build an AMI, you update a launch template with the new AMI and use instance refresh ( https:&#x2
502.
by dolni 6y ago
This is one of Kubernetes' biggest downfalls. On a small team, time is king. You likely don't have a team dedicated to keeping up with Kube releases, troubleshooting issues, etc. When you build something, you need it to work until
503.
by dolni 6y ago
Run EC2 instances in an autoscaling group. Provision them with whatever you're comfortable with. Ansible is nice because you can point it at a node to test the deploy out without having to always respin the node to try again. Have ansi
504.
by dolni 6y ago
Sure you can do that, and that works ok in some scenarios. But there are some problems. In a scenario like: > Now I have one lambda that gets pointed at a new record stream from an S3 bucket, and I'm done. Ok, so you got AWS set up
505.
by dolni 6y ago
> IMO what makes something serverless is that you don't need to provision or manage infrastructure, and also no need to worry about scaling as it will go up and down as needed. This is why serverless is such a stupid term to begin w
506.
by dolni 6y ago
> I was baffled, bemused even, by the article's premise that anyone rational ever thought serverless was going to take over the software world. The way people talk about it, I certainly get the impression that a lot of people think
507.
by dolni 6y ago
> > And, if I did build a system with a ton of active users, Lambda handles the scaling of that. > This is a bold claim to make without verifying it. I mean, Lambda's ability to scale is a well documented thing. It will happil
508.
by dolni 6y ago
> It's that it makes that level of code reuse that much simpler. You have all of these helper infrastructure functions that you implement for every single project you work on, and reusing that glue code is so, so much easier in Lamb