Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
djschnei
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
29 ms
·
271.
▲
How and how not to privatize – From State to Society
(cato-unbound.org)
2 points
by
djschnei
10y ago
|
0 comments
272.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
Interesting case. Isn't it true, however, that everything is economized whether we like it or not? Even public works that add "value" still rely on finite resources (human labor, natural resources, etc...). Can we really j
273.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
Kind of an interesting problem, no? It's a question between what things we want to economize and the things we don't want to economize. In the long run, however, I fail to see how we really have a choice. Since "public&quo
274.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
https://fee.org/articles/the-curse-of-machinery/
275.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
If, as you say, I am merely being charged for services, what do I do If services are being offered which I morally oppose and don't want to be part of? I am still forced to (coerced) to pay for them (theft) regardless of my usage. Fo
276.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
"Don't like police brutality? Just move!"
277.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
I find it endlessly amusing you're hypothetical for non-verbal consent is literally theft. However, I agree; taxation is necessary for government to exist. I'm also not an anarchist. I see taxation as a necessary evil, but I ref
278.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
I guess you missed my point. I'm sure the chemists had a good time.
279.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
Oh, so they have claim to a percentage of my labor? without my consent? That sounds like something...
280.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
You almost formed a complete sentence. I didn't do any of those things.
281.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
You just proved my point... that's force and coercion. "They don't shoot you, they just steal or money!"
282.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
solve government tampering with more tampering while continuing to blame "captialism". Glorious.
283.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
Until companies can walk around with guns or threaten you with imprisonment for not paying their fees or "enjoying" their products, the two are nothing alike. Advertising doesn't use physical force.
284.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
Huxley's vision was not one in which property rights were recognized.
285.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
They were so lucky to have a government that allowed them to become chemists.
286.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
But I want to be able to utilize all this cool free stuff that boosts my quality of life without seeing ads! It's my right! STOP OPPRESSING ME!
287.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
It is entirely in the customers interest for a business they support to be profitable, which advertising promotes. I'm sure residents of the DPRK would disagree that our ads are as invasive as their government propaganda. Or maybe the
288.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
I have an obligation to respect other peoples rights (which essentially all boil down to property rights). I have no obligation to help others if it isn't mutually beneficial. I might choose to, but it would infringe on my rights to
289.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
The ability to own property doesn't encompass property rights; especially when "own" is used as loosely as it is today. If property rights are entirely respected, how can someone be oppressed?
290.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
Except, you know, a lot different.
291.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
Who would say that? lol, that is absurd. Sounds like someone has been reading some Marxist Humanism. They do seem drastically opposed; in a system that disregards personal property rights, you can't use your property to better your an
292.
▲
Corax is a crowdsourced news aggregator run by libertarians
(cor.ax)
2 points
by
djschnei
10y ago
|
0 comments
293.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
"But healthcare (including all the labor and money that goes into it) is my right!!1!"
294.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fractionalreservebanking... Beyond that, I said "and" not "or". Interest rates and savings should be organically tied together. They should signal each oth
295.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
I said saving AND accurate interest rates, not "or".
296.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
lol what's a neo-con/libertarian ideal?
297.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
savings and accurate interest rates fuel a health economy, not debt.
298.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
Love how these guys call out the left and the right for their bullshit. Pretty rare nowadays...
299.
▲
by
djschnei
10y ago
Ok, let's do that. FBI: Let us in the backdoor? US: No.
300.
▲
10 Truth-Bombs Courtesy of Milton Friedman
(intellectualtakeout.org)
3 points
by
djschnei
10y ago
|
0 comments
More ›