Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
dimino
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
43 ms
·
421.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
In theory. In practice? Pick a spot inside the triangle.
422.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
Why is it "at the expense of" others, to own a home now? I've been trying for years to understand the concept of "everyone should be able to live everywhere" but I just cannot wrap my head around it, or it's co
423.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
Lower overhead if things go right, I think is the point.
424.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
Totally off topic, but there are houses that sell for $125 million? Yikes.
425.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
None are, actually.
426.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
The FUD is implying they've made significant progress. You're right, "we don't know" isn't really a falsifiable statement, in this context.
427.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
I don't think breaking up my comment into little contextless chunks is doing this conversation any favors.
428.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
I'm confused -- are you asking when an unsubstantiated claim is not FUD?
429.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
Other certs validate, it might be site-specific from my employer (I'm on my employer's network)?
430.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
I have a completely different cert, issued by Cisco Umbrella Secondary SubCA ash-SG: sha1 - 3B:AE:49:04:9E:6A:3D:BE:96:08:60:F0:9B:6B:2F:03:4F:E9:8C:43
431.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
Same here, I'm at work though, so it's probably my company.
432.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
Without any specific evidence, it's still FUD.
433.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
How is calling me "sheeplish" helpful for this conversation? The goal of the TSA is to create security theater, and that goal is effective at preventing terrorists from even attempting to attack airports. It's difficult
434.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
You've lost when you start saying words like "sheeple" and "Orwell" in these conversations, you realize that right?
435.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
The TSA provides value, security theater has its place.
436.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
Yeah, ironically DMV wait times are for people who aren't patient enough to wait for a low-traffic period of time, or to find a DMV that isn't busy.
437.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
I get emails most days (5 out of 7) from recruiters. They're mostly bots, but if you put your resume on the wrong site, you get on a series of lists, and can't get off of them.
438.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
This is a you thing. Nerds are cool now, the battle you're trying to fight is over.
439.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
Your own garden? True. Everything else you just listed actually does, at least on the ingredients (for prepared food). The more general point is that food in the US has to be at a certain level of quality to be sold, literal barcodes asid
440.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
I'll defer to you on identifying undesirable patterns from now on, sorry.
441.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
All food has bar codes.
442.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
I understand what you're getting at, and you make a fair point, but you really don't think there's a trend on HN where pretty much every idea is called obvious or terrible by some of the most popular comments on a given submi
443.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
> in part because it assumes that it shouldn’t be possible to infer specific sensitive details about people based on metadata alone. > One of the government’s justifications for allowing law enforcement and national security agencies
444.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
I think dang will take care of this comment (and the account?) in short order, novelty accounts are verboten on HN (as they provide no value).
445.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
I think you know you've got a winning idea when the esteemed commenters on HN all dismiss it out of hand. I hope I can Hyperloop from NY to LA some day, and if we can leverage the current high investment traffic to get that to happen,
446.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
Pulling what I wrote out of context isn't a very friendly way to debate online. :(
447.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
I don't believe expectation should set morality, because it's not clear what expectation is. You're basically relying on an implicit rule, rather than specifically defining that rule, and expecting people to know what you&#x
448.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
I completely agree with you. This boils down to OKC needing to enforce some kind of, "Our users have this expectation, so let's formalize it in writing somewhere." Informal systems and agreements are hard to navigate, and
449.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
I think there's a visceral reaction to this specific content, that "dating profile data" is different than "reddit comment history", despite being equally public, and both are probably similarly identifiable. It boi
450.
▲
by
dimino
10y ago
Your snark aside (c'mon, man), that doesn't even come close to answering the question of, "why is it not okay?" Making something public comes with the possibility that it might go "viral" or some other form of
More ›