dimino

49 ms·

451.
by dimino 10y ago
This article begs the question. Why does "Public not equal consent"?
452.
by dimino 10y ago
I'm going to upgrade my view of this article to linkbait title. The title should be, "THC found to not correlate with impairment in the same way that blood alcohol concentration does". From the article: > The study's
453.
by dimino 10y ago
That's not what that means, though. All that says is that testing positive for marijuana doesn't provide a meaningful measurement of impairment. It does not mean pot doesn't impact your driving.
454.
by dimino 10y ago
> with no real added benefit? Are you sure? Edit: Think study groups, DnD sessions, or other document-collaboration type use cases. Facebook does not make that particularly easy, and how mature is Facebook's enterprise support?
455.
by dimino 10y ago
> Marijuana doesn't significantly impair reflexes (as generations of musicians have shown). What reflexes do you need while playing an instrument?
456.
by dimino 10y ago
> If pot is proven to not affect your driving to a measurable degree What??
457.
by dimino 10y ago
I'm saying Tesla engineers aren't looking at this and throwing their hands up in the air, claiming this was supposed to happen, and I'm saying a bulletproof vest has failed to achieve its design goal if you can't wear it
458.
by dimino 10y ago
My farm, my stable, oats, and me, because people have been riding horses places for the past 5,000+ years in my metaphor (where a car is the bot and a horse is a web page), and there's no good reason to not ride a horse (use a web page
459.
by dimino 10y ago
I could reasonably ride a horse to work every day, it's only 2 miles.
460.
by dimino 10y ago
What you're trying to do is draw conclusions based on very small sets of data. Sure, the article submitted agrees with your conclusion, but there's simply no way to tell if the conclusion you're drawing (and what's st
461.
by dimino 10y ago
That's interesting, because I get maybe 1 fake Facebook friend request per year? I think a lot of the problems people have with Facebook are based in how Facebook gets used. If you have 400 friends, you're simply not getting the
462.
by dimino 10y ago
Inductive reasoning is how the scientific method works, however. "I've run 10,000 experiments that show toy bricks are green, therefore I can say with great confidence that all toy bricks are green." Knowing things with absol
463.
by dimino 10y ago
This article seems to give way more credence to the option of being able to tip Uber drivers than I think is warranted. Just to add on for folks in other parts of the world, in the US, if you work a job that gets tipped, you usually can l
464.
by dimino 10y ago
Tipping is some of the worst form of payment in existence. It's completely unregulated from a consumer standpoint, and is therefore subject to every single bias one can think of - sexism, racism, "attractivism"? Literally
465.
by dimino 10y ago
That's not my logic, it's the logic of the comment I replied to. What I'm trying to say is they specifically designed and built a collision detection system with the goal of preventing the car from hitting things parked in
466.
by dimino 10y ago
The Tesla was designed to avoid this collision. Are you trying to say that Tesla would prefer their car hit stuff?
467.
by dimino 10y ago
Relax, I'm just trying to point out that Tesla did not intend to build a car that would run into stationary objects.
468.
by dimino 10y ago
I see the distinction you're trying to make, but it's not referencing the design. Are you suggesting collision detection is not designed to prevent collisions?
469.
by dimino 10y ago
You're begging the question, I'm saying their price hike is not an "insane" amount.
470.
by dimino 10y ago
I meant what I said. Collision detection was not designed to work under human supervision, which means when it runs into something, it has failed its design. Tesla cars are not designed to run into things.
471.
by dimino 10y ago
> You said it's designed to work without human supervision. When?
472.
by dimino 10y ago
What kind of behavior do you expect out of software in "beta"?
473.
by dimino 10y ago
I didn't say "x being intended as the sole thing performing Y", I said, "It's designed to avoid collisions from the front and sides.", which it was.
474.
by dimino 10y ago
No it doesn't. And you're still ignoring the part where I said it doesn't matter if it was designed intentionally this way or not, it shouldn't behave this way, regardless.
475.
by dimino 10y ago
Protruding objects? Okay, so "move fast and break through skin" is easier for you to swallow, then?
476.
by dimino 10y ago
https://www.teslamotors.com/models "Digital control of motors, brakes, and steering helps avoid collisions from the front and sides, and prevents the car from wandering off the road." It's designed to avoid c
477.
by dimino 10y ago
This time.
478.
by dimino 10y ago
> That's not true. The software is designed to work under human supervision It was not designed to work under human supervision, but even if it was, that design was wrong, and the design was broken from the start.
479.
by dimino 10y ago
"Move fast and break things." probably didn't literally mean bones.
480.
by dimino 10y ago
The software did not work as designed, because it is designed, above all else, to not hit stationary objects.

More ›