Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
digging
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
19 ms
·
301.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
Weird that I don't see any links to this, supposedly the definitive test: https://aphantasia.com/study/vviq/
302.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
Yes, well, that's not what anyone is doing. Here is the logic that caused surprise: 1. Leaders identify with nonbinary pronouns, 2. thus: leaders appear to be members of the/a queer community, 3. and: queer community members tend
303.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
Then say "constraints" if it feels better. To me, this conversation comes off as much more of a manufactured problem than idealistic people living on a boat and figuring out how to make tech work for them. Edit: However, upon re
304.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
I've read, and like, a theory that their unpredictable movement is a big driver in the fear of spiders and snakes. I just found this with a quick search, for some evidence (it's not what I read originally, years ago): https:/
305.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
I'm loving your contributions to these comments. Tangentially: assuming I had the drive + health to make the change, do you feel it would be a particularly challenging move for a software engineer to abandon their career to go back to
306.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
If the definition doesn't matter, better to use a more generic term than a more specific/cryptic one.
307.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
"Some people did X" !== "All people do X"
308.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
> provides an excuse to bad security policies That's a (highly predictable) implementation problem of HSCN, not a problem with the idea. These complaints boil down to the same old thing: stupidly written law setting a (potentially)
309.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
I just read your first article and it's decent. As I expected, it makes no attempt to offer any evidence that the CNE has published reliable results, or that the math in TFA is faulty in any way. It simply talks about the difficulty of
310.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
You've missed the mark, and admittedly I was vague, but you seem to be talking about a completely separate phenomenon from the one I replied to. I am not talking about "technology putting people out of work." I am talking abo
311.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
Is writing synth music in python more enjoyable or practical than a visual virtual synth like VCV Rack? Granted I don't like python, but for me writing music in pure code looks tedious.
312.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
Scale and availability matter
313.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
I believe the request is "Stop using your wrong beliefs to try to influence others", not "Stop reading inexpert opinions"
314.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
Citation needed
315.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
Is "implicitly unambiguous" anything but an oxymoron? Do you think all humans have access to your mental model of the world?
316.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
The LPs are pretty laughable. From the outside it's completely obvious that at least some are not followed in any way that a reasonable person would interpret them. You mentioned a few, such as their supposed "customer obsession.&
317.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
You might be right, but I don't think it effectively addresses the problems. Even if I can convince every medical provider and bank and whatever else service I can't even remember that I refuse to provide my SSN, except when str
318.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
In fact, it was designed not to be used that way, but someone at some point got lazy and now here we are.
319.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
Oh yes, I agree that regulation would need to be more robust to future exploitation. But banning the points system isn't intrinsically going to increase their profits, or they wouldn't be running it in the first place.
320.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
> I'm not interested in things that are very similar to this one. Are you sure this is an accurate description of your taste? Or do you mean "I'm not interested in things that are similar, but lower quality"? I'm
321.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
Telling someone what you'd do in that situation is also another way of sussing out context they haven't told you yet. As an extremely simplified example: "I'd probably remove that piece right there first. It doesn't
322.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
I think we're in agreement about what the rewards system is. I'm just saying that the side effect of getting points-users really invested in using points is a second layer of the scam. Obviously it is good for the credit card issu
323.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
That's not a counterpoint. The root comment says "this harms others for personal gain," and your rebuttal is "but I gain something". Just to be clear, playing these ridiculous point games isn't something I'
324.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
It's not about annoying you, that's just acceptable collateral. It's about stealing from you.
325.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
> you cannot fix people problems with tech For very specific values of "people problem", "fix", and "tech". In reality, a more true (and relevant) assertion is "appropriate tools can make virtually any
326.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
> It's quite easy to ride a bike around the suburbs and kids in particular do it all the time. First, I don't agree. Most of the suburbs I've lived in or near have extremely low bicycle traffic, even though kids do it some
327.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
I'm unfamiliar with Minneapolis - sounds pretty amazing if there's a strong bicycle culture there, but not if "people" only means <1% of commuters. Bicycle enthusiasts live everywhere and are willing to make difficult
328.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
But it is . Over 77% of US workers commute in a car even in this data which includes people who work from home (ie don't regularly commute): https://www.bts.gov/browse-statistical-products-and-data/sta... So if y
329.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
Indeed, “If they really confirm phosphine and ammonia robustly it raises the chances of biological origin. The natural next thing will be new people will look at it and give support or counter-arguments. The story will be resolved by more d
330.
▲
by
digging
2y ago
Have you read Termination Shock, and if so, how do you feel it stacks up? It was, regrettably, my first (and still only) Stephenson book, and I thought it was really quite bad in all the ways that matter to me. (The action was good, but I d
More ›