3 ms·

Citation needed

• neura 2y ago
  I love that this comment came up directly after (at the time I'm writing this comment) "Math doesn't care about your feelings."
  • user3939382 2y ago
    That has nothing to do with my comment. There's a reasonable explanation for the anomaly and none of this has anything to do with my feelings.
• user3939382 2y ago
  Sure here you go https://www.caracaschronicles.com/2024/07/31/falsifying-vote-tallies-is-very-hard-heres-why/ https://www.caracaschronicles.com/2024/07/31/falsifying-vote... https://venezuelanalysis.com/news/13801/ https://venezuelanalysis.com/news/13801/ https://www.ndi.org/e-voting-guide/examples/e-voting-audits-venezuela https://www.ndi.org/e-voting-guide/examples/e-voting-audits-...
  • digging 2y ago
    I just read your first article and it's decent. As I expected, it makes no attempt to offer any evidence that the CNE has published reliable results, or that the math in TFA is faulty in any way. It simply talks about the difficulty of falsifying specific documents, and how that would make it difficult for a false report to continue when pressed (which is exactly what's happening - Maduro is pressed, and has no evidence to show). And it concludes with a pretty strong suggestion that the CNE's unverifiable tallies are, in fact, a lie. So, I appreciate the independent confirmation that Maduro's victory is a likely sham. It's also quite reassuring to note that producing actual fake ballots would, in fact, be extremely difficult - just as you claimed! That gives me hope that Maduro will fail to convince others of his victory, since it's probably a complete fabrication.