dextralt

7 ms·

1.
by dextralt 6y ago
So if all those people who hold problematic opinions would go and make their own privately owned website, everyone would be happy?
2.
by dextralt 6y ago
>Two world wars later and we've decided that maybe Nationalism isn't such a great thing The states that brought Germany down in both world wars were just as nationalistic at the time. Even the commies brought it back when they
3.
by dextralt 6y ago
not possible anymore. a platform that has reddit-tier moderation policy from the get-go would never gain traction
4.
by dextralt 6y ago
This is exactly what's going to happen, not just with PWAs but with all websites. The mechanism ("Google Safe Browsing") is in place, precedents are being set, the number of hysterical ideologues who will support that is grow
5.
by dextralt 6y ago
The case for freedom of religion has never looked more questionable than it does right now. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_terrorism_in_Europe Trying to wave away this debate by just shouting “RACIST! NAZI!” con
6.
by dextralt 6y ago
I wholeheartedly agree. Private companies should be free of regulation and be free to do whatever they want, like refusing service to whoever they want - nazis, flat-earthers, homosexuals, anti-vaxxers, conspiracy theorists, blacks, etc.
7.
by dextralt 6y ago
>36.6% Non-Hispanic White >41.4% Non-Hispanic White 4.8%. that sure makes a world of difference. I'm wondering if you're implying that there's something wrong with having such a preference though. You have provided some
8.
by dextralt 6y ago
Oh reeeeeeeeeeally? You didn't think it was "needed"? >Hate speech in the United States is not regulated due to the robust right to free speech found in the American Constitution.[1] The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly r
9.
by dextralt 6y ago
It is a very widely accepted notion (among everyone who matters) that ethnostates have no place in the modern world. Hell, it is nearly as universally accepted that the very concept of "ethnicity" is problematic. So why should it
10.
by dextralt 6y ago
>The overwhelming majority of young people (and people overall, though not by nearly the same margin) are left leaning or very left for some reason that phenomena only manifests itself on heavily moderated platforms. on unmoderated (chan
11.
by dextralt 7y ago
you mean the same things we did to each other throughout our entire history and yet somehow our civilization had advanced past the stone age? yeah, it is their own fault, lmao.
12.
by dextralt 7y ago
I suppose you have similar concerns about men occupying the overwhelming majority of physically taxing and hazardous jobs, correct? Obviously, we both know there are no intrinsic differences between men and women, so this is a great injusti
13.
by dextralt 7y ago
If you think very carefully about Mozilla, you'll realize that they're controlled opposition on a short leash, with almost the entirety of their revenue coming from Google. Guess nobody should be working there either, huh? >If
14.
by dextralt 7y ago
'Amazon' is an _English_ translation of a _Greek_ name given to an _Eurasian_ tribe. What claim do _South American_ nations have for it? I loathe to defend Amazon and ICANN of all the fucking things, but come on now. There are ple
15.
by dextralt 7y ago
>a world of equality and universal justice >resentment and mutual distrust which of these goals do you think an entity like Goldman Sachs is more likely to pursue?
16.
by dextralt 7y ago
Sorry, but no. You may be descendant of Eastern European serfs, you still carry the blood guilt.
17.
by dextralt 7y ago
google 'github meritocracy' TLDR, meritocracy is now considered to be a far-right concept.
18.
by dextralt 7y ago
- Authoritarian ideologies, such as fascism and communism, have no place in our society and their proponents must be shunned - People should be judged (i.e. admitted to college or hired) by the content of their character and not by the colo
19.
by dextralt 7y ago
And I don't get that kind of bootlicking mentality. Google services are (mostly) free. Advertisements come with the territory. As for 'pushing', I'm using the search and youtube daily and I don't even have a googl
20.
by dextralt 7y ago
>"... is a private company and it is their right to refuse service to anyone" >"Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences" >"en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope_fallacy" Noth
21.
by dextralt 7y ago
"What has kept England on its feet during the past year? In part, no doubt, some vague idea about a better future, but chiefly the atavistic emotion of patriotism, the ingrained feeling of the English-speaking peoples that they are sup
22.
by dextralt 7y ago
Hell yes I support waterboarding terrorists. There's no way the definition of 'terrorist' will ever change. There's no way it will be ever done to me. Hell yes I support civil forfeiture with no due process. There's
23.
by dextralt 7y ago
You must be really excited about the current administration's effort to fight end-to-end encryption then. Can't have them thoughtcriminals spreading their wrongthink¹. ¹ definition is subject to change depending on which entity is
24.
by dextralt 7y ago
>RE "socialism": this isn't intended to be socialism as a religion It was a poor choice of words to put it in the tagline then, for a number of reasons.
25.
by dextralt 7y ago
According to the fact that discriminatory hiring and college admission practices are deemed perfectly acceptable. You want some sources on that?
26.
by dextralt 7y ago
in case you haven't noticed, progressives have long since moved on from the idea of "equality" of races and sexes.
27.
by dextralt 7y ago
>Diversity is strength I'd like to point out that it is a notion held by a minuscule % of the population. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/07/12/in-views-of... And I believe that the op