Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
devilshaircut
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
by
devilshaircut
12y ago
The follow-up comments: > Malcolm Pollack 14 Apr 2014 at 2:33 pm > “Not white”? “Not male”? > How about “No Irish need apply”? > Imagine if you announced that you were looking to fill job openings, but didn’t want any women or b
32.
▲
by
devilshaircut
12y ago
It is my limited understanding that the idea of "a different photon" would be sort of irrelevant here as quantum state is the only thing that differentiates objects such as photons from one another. Outside of that, photons are es
33.
▲
by
devilshaircut
12y ago
Kicking them when they are down definitely doesn't make sense and I still agree with you there. All I am saying is that those 3 points you listed here really do little to paint a lifetime of 70 years. I am certain you'd have littl
34.
▲
by
devilshaircut
12y ago
> "All that being said, I'm not sure what the point of making criminals out of homeless people is. No reason to kick people when they are down." I agree with this point that you said. The rest I think is pretty unfair; we
35.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
Ah - I see what menu does now. I love this game and have uncovered a few broken game states. This mainly happens when I reassign one of the API methods. Are you interested in user-submitted issues? Let me know; I could email them to you or
36.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
Btw, I should have said first that I love this game idea and myself and my coworkers have been playing it a bit for the last 20 minutes or so. I broke my game by reassigning the getWidth method to return an invalid value: map.getWidth = fun
37.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
I broke level 4. Is there an obvious way that I am missing to reset at the level you're on when the reset functionality provided under the text editor is insufficient?
38.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
This may have already been posted in another thread, but it doesn't appear to have been posted here. But this is a great visualization for the Pythagorean Theorem. http://i.imgur.com/W8VJp.gif Fun for kids, also, when
39.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
"Merely" - no; your comment was nothing less than a straw man argument. I didn't say "Constitutional" anywhere, nor did I imply it. I stated unequivocally that it goes against the values of freedom the US was founde
40.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
Why does the quantity of private parties matter? He publicly donated money. I don't understand why you believe he is immune to criticism. Do you understand that he is CEO of a large company? Do you understand that LGBT individuals and
41.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
From the poster who suggested the use of the term "thought police": > "The term 'thought-police' does not necessarily have a government connotation." If it is not government, then the party under discussion
42.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
And private individuals or organizations cannot? The flaw of logic is obvious.
43.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
I agree with you and regarding the poster to whom you were replying, all I can say is that I find it really disturbing that she or he believes publicly held beliefs from private citizens should be immune from public commentary. The conseque
44.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
I didn't say that it "granted" anything. I said that in the US was founded on a specific idea of freedom. You're not being pedantic because what you say simply does not apply. Explain where I attempted to make a "Co
45.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
Thanks - glad you liked it. We've considered releasing it into the wild. Mostly it was just a fun hack project. Maybe we will do a blog post or something and show people in a bigger scale. The channels on the right are related to the M
46.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
How does this "smack of the thought police"? OKCupid is not a government organization. At worst, they are expressing their own political belief. If you are considering the situation outside of the context of OKCupid, then I do not
47.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
I agree with you. And frankly I am so appalled by the false equivalence offered by many 'liberals' on this issue. Rather than recognize that this freedom falls squarely within the preamble of the US Declaration of Independence, it
48.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
http://designarchives.aiga.org/#/entries/%2Bid%3A440/_/detai... Here is a very interesting example of this.
49.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
I'll send you some info via your website about my startup. Thanks again for setting this up. Very cool.
50.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
There are a lot of startups not based out of ATV. Anyhow - signing up for this. Excited to see what could come of it.
51.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
Here is something I hacked together with some fellow HN lurkers, in case the YT API stuff tickles your fancy: youstars.herokuapp.com/#/michellephan (using Michelle Phan's channel just as an example since it looks good). Doesn
52.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
Pretty fun game. Clever way to scout internships as well. Hah!
53.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
Absolutely I am. I don't need to share the evidence with you because, as a thinking and contributing member to these forums, I am sure you have accessed it yourself. Is there any reason I wouldn't discard an argument in favor of i
54.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
I agree with you and I would add one other small thing on the "they are not going to come to you" point. Working from the assumption that this is a true proposition, it still wouldn't make recruiting a problem which is easily
55.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
I agree with you and I want to add that in my view, the idea of something which is so clearly a front-and-center human rights issue, cannot easily be "overblown". Violence against people, discrimination, hate-based crimes - thes
56.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
Just LG I think many people would say, actually. I've come to the point where I think the acronym is silly. I think right now we are up to "LGBTQIAPK". I may be a little out of date on that. The fact is, some of the issues be
57.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
I find it horrific that you consider your rights to be personally violated by your making use of a free, non-government-controlled, non-required public service. I find it also horrific that you make a false parallel to text editors which al
58.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
So, in parallel, Christianity, since it advocates the religious ceremony of marriage between a man and a woman, must also be inherently sexual in nature. I hope it is not too arrogant of me to assume that you are straight because I cannot f
59.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
Thank you for pointing this out. Saved me a lot of citations. You are, by the way, absolutely correct.
60.
▲
by
devilshaircut
13y ago
This is a ludicrous rationale. The moment something is merely mentioned in a law, it is henceforth to be considered under the header of "political topic"? Why? Because some political strategist (or worse, lobbyist) told you it was
More ›