I agree with you and regarding the poster to whom you were replying, all I can say is that I find it really disturbing that she or he believes publicly held bel

I agree with you and regarding the poster to whom you were replying, all I can say is that I find it really disturbing that she or he believes publicly held beliefs from private citizens should be immune from public commentary. The consequences of this reasoning are severe and dangerous. To disagree with someone makes me the "thought police"? I just don't see how this applies at all. EDIT: I am adding this as an afterthought but honestly to totally disregard the Orwellian connotation of the term "thought police" I think is a very liberal application of the term.